Fear of reinjury following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

被引:21
|
作者
Mir, Basit [1 ]
Vivekanantha, Prushoth [2 ]
Dhillon, Saihajleen [3 ]
Cotnareanu, Odette [4 ]
Cohen, Dan [5 ]
Nagai, Kanto [6 ]
de Sa, Darren [5 ]
机构
[1] Ashford & St Peters Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Chertsey, Surrey, England
[2] McMaster, Michael DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, 1200 Main St West,4E14, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[6] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; ACL reconstruction; Fear of reinjury; Kinesiophobia; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; TAMPA SCALE; KNEE; KINESIOPHOBIA; AVOIDANCE; RETURN; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ASSOCIATION; IMPAIRMENT; CONFIDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-022-07296-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This review aims to elucidate the most commonly reported method to quantify fear of reinjury or kinesiophobia and to identify key variables that influence the degree of kinesiophobia following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods A systematic search across three databases (Pubmed, Ovid (MEDLINE), and EMBASE) was conducted from database inception to August 7th, 2022. The authors adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Results Twenty-six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and resulted in 2,213 total patients with a mean age of 27.6 years and a mean follow-up time of 36.7 months post-surgery. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 11 out of 16 for non-comparative studies and 18 out of 24 for comparative studies. Eighty-eight percent of included studies used variations of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) to quantify kinesiophobia and 27.0% used Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI). The results of this study shows a common association between higher kinesiophobia and poor patient-reported functional status measured using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Scores, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Quality of Life (QOL), and Sports/Recreation (S/R) subscales of Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm scores. Postoperative symptoms and pain catastrophizing measured using the KOOS pain and symptom subscales and Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) also influenced the degree of kinesiophobia following ACLR. Patients with an increased injury to surgery time and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively demonstrated higher levels of kinesiophobia. Less common variables included being a female patient, low preoperative and postoperative activity status and low self-efficacy. Conclusion The most common methods used to report kinesiophobia following primary ACLR were variations of the TSK scale followed by ACL-RSI. The most commonly reported factors influencing higher kinesiophobia in this patient population include lower patient-reported functional status, more severe postoperative symptoms such as pain, increased injury to surgery time, and being closer to the date of surgery postoperatively. Kinesiophobia following primary ACLR is a critical element affecting post-surgical outcomes, and screening should be implemented postoperatively to potentially treat in rehabilitation and recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:2299 / 2314
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fear of reinjury following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    Basit Mir
    Prushoth Vivekanantha
    Saihajleen Dhillon
    Odette Cotnareanu
    Dan Cohen
    Kanto Nagai
    Darren de SA
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 2299 - 2314
  • [2] Factors informing fear of reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Ross, Cheryl A.
    Clifford, Amanda
    Louw, Quinette A.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 33 (02) : 103 - 114
  • [3] Return to Sport Activities and Risk of Reinjury Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos
    Valentino, Leonard A.
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2022, 10 (08): : 648 - 660
  • [4] A systematic review of bracing following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Smith, Toby O.
    Davies, Leigh
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2008, 94 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [5] The Association of Pain and Fear of Movement/Reinjury With Function During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation
    Chmielewski, Terese L.
    Jones, Debi
    Day, Tim
    Tillman, Susan M.
    Lentz, Trevor A.
    George, Steven Z.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 38 (12): : 746 - 753
  • [6] The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury
    Dunn, WR
    Lyman, S
    Lincoln, AE
    Amoroso, PJ
    Wickiewicz, T
    Marx, RG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (08): : 1906 - 1914
  • [7] Return to Sport Tests' Prognostic Value for Reinjury Risk after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Ashigbi, Evans Yayra Kwaku
    Banzer, Winfried
    Niederer, Daniel
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2020, 52 (06) : 1263 - 1271
  • [8] Objective Criteria for Return to Athletics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Subsequent Reinjury Rates: A Systematic Review
    Barber-Westin, Sue D.
    Noyes, Frank R.
    PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2011, 39 (03): : 100 - 110
  • [9] Is postural control restored following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review
    Howells, Brooke E.
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Webster, Kate E.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (07) : 1168 - 1177
  • [10] An Assessment of Rehabilitation Protocols Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Indorato, Daniel
    Sturgil, Ronda
    REHABILITATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME, 2016, 5