Development and content validity of a questionnaire to assess knowledge about delirium

被引:0
|
作者
Zilezinski, Max [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lohrmann, Renee [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hauss, Armin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bergjan, Manuela [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Geschaftsbereich Pflegedirekt Pflegewissensch, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[5] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Univ Med Halle Saale, AG Versorgungsforsch & Pflege Krankenhaus, Dept Innere Med,Med Fak, Halle, Saale, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fak, Dorothea Erxleben Lernzentrum Halle DELH, Projekt FORMAT, Halle, Saale, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE | 2023年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词
Delirium; Evaluation; Education; Nursing; Content validity index; NURSES KNOWLEDGE; RISK-FACTORS; CARE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00391-022-02015-9
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that can have serious consequences and is often overlooked by healthcare professionals. The level of knowledge about delirium is often insufficient among nursing and medical staff. At the current time there is no suitable questionnaire to record the level of knowledge in German-speaking countries. Aim Development of a questionnaire and evaluation of content validity. Methods Following a literature search to identify current best practice, several questionnaires were identified. An already published questionnaire with the dimensions of basic knowledge of delirium and risk factors has been translated, adapted and extended by the dimension of nonpharmacological delirium prevention. Delirium experts assessed the relevance of the questionnaire items in two rounds of reviews. Content validity was calculated using the Content Validity Index (CVI) at item (I-CVI) and scale (S-CVI) level. Additionally, the modified Kappa (k*) was calculated using a lower 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The original 30-item questionnaire was expanded to include 18 delirium prevention items. After the first round of scoring 30 out of 48 items showed good to excellent I-CVI scores. Considering the comments, 6 items were discarded and 12 were adapted in terms of language and content. In the final version of the questionnaire 41 items with excellent scores remained. The total scale score increased from 0.88 in the first version to 1.0 in the final version. Nurses were identified as the target group, potentially also therapists and medical personnel. Conclusion The delirium knowledge questionnaire is content-valid.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of a questionnaire to assess patient knowledge of their medicines
    Garcia Delgado, Pilar
    Gastelurrutia Garralda, Miguel Angel
    Baena Parejo, Maria Isabel
    Fisac Lozano, Federico
    Martinez Martinez, Fernando
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2009, 41 (12): : 661 - 668
  • [22] Development and assessment of a MOOC about delirium in geriatric oncology
    Antoine, Valery
    Nicolas, Charlotte
    Albarede, Julie
    Azria, David
    Cristol, Laurence
    Jeandel, Claude
    Ferreira, Ernestine
    Morel, Charlotte
    Mourey, Loic
    Balardy, Laurent
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2021, 108 (12) : 1101 - 1111
  • [23] Knowledge of residents about delirium and its management in the elderly and restless patient
    Levassort, Helene
    Cudennec, Tristan
    Courtois-Amiot, Pauline
    Teillet, Laurent
    Pepin, Marion
    GERIATRIE ET PSYCHOLOGIE NEUROPSYCHIATRIE DE VIEILLISSEMENT, 2022, 20 (01): : 63 - 75
  • [24] Determination of Content Validity of the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Comfort Questionnaire Using the Content Validity Index
    Egger-Rainer, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2018, 26 (02) : 398 - 410
  • [25] Psychometric evaluation of the family caregiver ICU delirium knowledge questionnaire
    Krewulak, Karla D.
    Bull, Margaret J.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    Stelfox, Henry T.
    Fiest, Kirsten M.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [26] Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Scientism
    Korte, Stefan
    Berger, Roland
    Imwalle, Christian
    Haenze, Martin
    DIAGNOSTICA, 2017, 63 (01): : 42 - 54
  • [27] Validity and reliability of the Huet questionnaire to assess maximal oxygen uptake
    Trivel, D
    Calmels, P
    Léger, L
    Busso, T
    Devillard, X
    Castells, J
    Denis, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYSIOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 2004, 29 (05): : 623 - 638
  • [28] The development of a questionnaire to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis patient's knowledge about methotrexate
    Fayet, Francoise
    Savel, Carine
    Rodere, Malory
    Pereira, Bruno
    Abdi, Dihya
    Mathieu, Sylvain
    Tournadre, Anne
    Soubrier, Martin
    Dubost, Jean-Jacques
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2016, 25 (5-6) : 682 - 689
  • [29] Development and Validity of the Nurse Presenteeism Questionnaire
    Shan, Geyan
    Wang, Shengnan
    Feng, Kai
    Wang, Wei
    Guo, Shujie
    Li, Yongxin
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [30] Development of a Measurement Tool to Assess Students' Knowledge and Perceptions About Cancer (SKPaC)
    Barros, Ana
    Moreira, Luis
    Santos, Helena
    Ribeiro, Nuno
    Santos-Silva, Filipe
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (03) : 556 - 561