Commissioning and clinical implementation of an independent dose calculation system for scanned proton beams

被引:0
|
作者
Dreindl, Ralf [1 ,6 ]
Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta [1 ]
Fayos-Sola, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Cabal, Fatima Padilla [1 ,3 ]
Scheuchenpflug, Lukas [1 ,4 ]
Elia, Alessio [1 ]
Amico, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Carlino, Antonio [1 ]
Stock, Markus [1 ]
Grevillot, Loic [1 ]
机构
[1] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
[2] Hosp Univ La Princesa, Dept Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Madrid, Spain
[3] Med Univ Vienna, AKH Wien, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Med Radiat Phys, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Fac Phys, Dept Isotope Phys, Vienna, Austria
[5] IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Padua, Italy
[6] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Marie Curie Str 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
beam time reduction; clinical implementation; commissioning; independent dose calculation; pencil beam scanning; proton therapy; GAMMA-EVALUATION; THERAPY; VALIDATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14328
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeExperimental patient-specific QA (PSQA) is a time and resource-intensive process, with a poor sensitivity in detecting errors. Radiation therapy facilities aim to substitute it by means of independent dose calculation (IDC) in combination with a comprehensive beam delivery QA program. This paper reports on the commissioning of the IDC software tool myQA iON (IBA Dosimetry) for proton therapy and its clinical implementation at the MedAustron Ion Therapy Center.MethodsThe IDC commissioning work included the validation of the beam model, the implementation and validation of clinical CT protocols, and the evaluation of patient treatment data. Dose difference maps, gamma index distributions, and pass rates (GPR) have been reviewed. The performance of the IDC tool has been assessed and clinical workflows, simulation settings, and GPR tolerances have been defined.ResultsBeam model validation showed agreement of ranges within +/- 0.2 mm, Bragg-Peak widths within +/- 0.1 mm, and spot sizes at various air gaps within +/- 5% compared to physical measurements. Simulated dose in 2D reference fields deviated by -0.3% +/- 0.5%, while 3D dose distributions differed by 1.8% on average to measurements. Validation of the CT calibration resulted in systematic differences of 2.0% between IDC and experimental data for tissue like samples. GPRs of 99.4 +/- 0.6% were found for head, head and neck, and pediatric CT protocols on a 2%/2 mm gamma criterion. GPRs for the adult abdomen protocol were at 98.9% on average with 3%/3 mm. Root causes of GPR outliers, for example, implants were identified and evaluated.ConclusionIDC has been successfully commissioned and integrated into the MedAustron clinical workflow for protons in 2021. IDC has been stepwise and safely substituting experimental PSQA since February 2021. The initial reduction of proton experimental PSQA was about 25% and reached up to 90% after 1 year.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Faraday cup for commissioning and quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning beams at conventional and ultra-high dose rates
    Winterhalter, C.
    Togno, M.
    Nesteruk, K. P.
    Emert, F.
    Psoroulas, S.
    Vidal, M.
    Meer, D.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A.
    Safai, S.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (12)
  • [22] Searching for optimized selection of Monte Carlo dose calculation parameters for scanned beam proton therapy in RayStation
    Kim, Heejung
    Chung, Kwangzoo
    Han, Youngyih
    Park, Won
    Park, Hee Chul
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Choi, Doo Ho
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 83 (07) : 572 - 580
  • [23] Performance of independent dose calculation in helical tomotherapy: implementation of the MCSIM code
    Eric Dzintars
    Sotirios Stathakis
    Panayiotis Mavroidis
    Amir Sadeghi
    Nikos Papanikolaou
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2012, 35 : 423 - 438
  • [24] Performance of independent dose calculation in helical tomotherapy: implementation of the MCSIM code
    Dzintars, Eric
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Sadeghi, Amir
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2012, 35 (04) : 423 - 438
  • [25] Commissioning and clinical implementation of the first commercial independent Monte Carlo 3D dose calculation to replace CyberKnife M6™ patient-specific QA measurements
    Milder, Maaike T. W.
    Alber, Markus
    Soehn, Matthias
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 304 - 311
  • [26] Monte Carlo implementation of new algorithms for the evaluation of averaged-dose and -track linear energy transfers in 62 MeV clinical proton beams
    Petringa, G.
    Pandola, L.
    Agosteo, S.
    Catalano, R.
    Colautti, P.
    Conte, V
    Cuttone, G.
    Fan, K.
    Mei, Z.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    Selva, A.
    Cirrone, G. A. P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (23)
  • [27] The Effects of a Dynamic Collimation System On Proton Pencil Beams to Improve Lateral Tissue Sparing in Spot Scanned Proton Therapy
    Hill, P.
    Wang, D.
    Flynn, R.
    Hyer, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 298 - 298
  • [28] Calculation of clinical dose distributions in proton therapy from microdosimetry
    Bertolet, Alejandro
    Antonio Cortes-Giraldo, Miguel
    Souris, Kevin
    Cohilis, Marie
    Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (12) : 5816 - 5823
  • [29] Dosimetric accuracy of a treatment planning system for actively scanned proton beams and small target volumes: Monte Carlo and experimental validation
    Magro, G.
    Molinelli, S.
    Mairani, A.
    Mirandola, A.
    Panizza, D.
    Russo, S.
    Ferrari, A.
    Valvo, F.
    Fossati, P.
    Ciocca, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (17) : 6865 - 6880
  • [30] Beam data commissioning, validation and clinical implementation of SRS gyroscopic system
    Souto, Catarina
    Aguilar, Borja
    Dias, Vania
    Pascual, Enrique
    Farinha, Gabriel
    Marcelino, Carlos
    Rodrigues, Carlos
    Teles, Pedro
    Perez-Rozos, Alberto
    Sallabanda, Morena
    Sallabanda, Kita
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 133