Commissioning and clinical implementation of an independent dose calculation system for scanned proton beams

被引:0
|
作者
Dreindl, Ralf [1 ,6 ]
Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta [1 ]
Fayos-Sola, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Cabal, Fatima Padilla [1 ,3 ]
Scheuchenpflug, Lukas [1 ,4 ]
Elia, Alessio [1 ]
Amico, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Carlino, Antonio [1 ]
Stock, Markus [1 ]
Grevillot, Loic [1 ]
机构
[1] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
[2] Hosp Univ La Princesa, Dept Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Madrid, Spain
[3] Med Univ Vienna, AKH Wien, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Med Radiat Phys, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Fac Phys, Dept Isotope Phys, Vienna, Austria
[5] IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Padua, Italy
[6] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Marie Curie Str 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
beam time reduction; clinical implementation; commissioning; independent dose calculation; pencil beam scanning; proton therapy; GAMMA-EVALUATION; THERAPY; VALIDATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14328
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeExperimental patient-specific QA (PSQA) is a time and resource-intensive process, with a poor sensitivity in detecting errors. Radiation therapy facilities aim to substitute it by means of independent dose calculation (IDC) in combination with a comprehensive beam delivery QA program. This paper reports on the commissioning of the IDC software tool myQA iON (IBA Dosimetry) for proton therapy and its clinical implementation at the MedAustron Ion Therapy Center.MethodsThe IDC commissioning work included the validation of the beam model, the implementation and validation of clinical CT protocols, and the evaluation of patient treatment data. Dose difference maps, gamma index distributions, and pass rates (GPR) have been reviewed. The performance of the IDC tool has been assessed and clinical workflows, simulation settings, and GPR tolerances have been defined.ResultsBeam model validation showed agreement of ranges within +/- 0.2 mm, Bragg-Peak widths within +/- 0.1 mm, and spot sizes at various air gaps within +/- 5% compared to physical measurements. Simulated dose in 2D reference fields deviated by -0.3% +/- 0.5%, while 3D dose distributions differed by 1.8% on average to measurements. Validation of the CT calibration resulted in systematic differences of 2.0% between IDC and experimental data for tissue like samples. GPRs of 99.4 +/- 0.6% were found for head, head and neck, and pediatric CT protocols on a 2%/2 mm gamma criterion. GPRs for the adult abdomen protocol were at 98.9% on average with 3%/3 mm. Root causes of GPR outliers, for example, implants were identified and evaluated.ConclusionIDC has been successfully commissioned and integrated into the MedAustron clinical workflow for protons in 2021. IDC has been stepwise and safely substituting experimental PSQA since February 2021. The initial reduction of proton experimental PSQA was about 25% and reached up to 90% after 1 year.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Independent dose calculations for commissioning, quality assurance and dose reconstruction of PBS proton therapy
    Meier, G.
    Besson, R.
    Nanz, A.
    Safai, S.
    Lomax, A. J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (07) : 2819 - 2836
  • [2] Out-of-field Dose for Scanned and Scattered Proton Beams
    Moyers, Michael F.
    APPLICATION OF ACCELERATORS IN RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY, 2009, 1099 : 456 - 459
  • [3] Requirements for dose calculation on an active scanned proton beamline for small, shallow fields
    Knaeusl, B.
    Langgartner, L.
    Stock, M.
    Janson, M.
    Furutani, K. M.
    Beltran, C. J.
    Georg, D.
    Resch, A. F.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 113
  • [4] Clinical implementation and commissioning of the MedAustron Particle Therapy Accelerator for non-isocentric scanned proton beam treatments
    Grevillot, Loic
    Osorio Moreno, Jhonnatan
    Letellier, Virgile
    Dreindl, Ralf
    Elia, Alessio
    Fuchs, Hermann
    Carlino, Antonio
    Kragl, Gabriele
    Palmans, Hugo
    Vatnitsky, Stanislav
    Stock, Markus
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 380 - 392
  • [5] Application of dose kernel calculation using a simplified Monte Carlo method to treatment plan for scanned proton beams
    Mizutani, Shohei
    Takada, Yoshihisa
    Kohno, Ryosuke
    Hotta, Kenji
    Tansho, Ryohei
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (02): : 315 - 327
  • [6] Clinical commissioning of an in vivo range verification system for prostate cancer treatment with anterior and anterior oblique proton beams
    Hoesl, M.
    Deepak, S.
    Moteabbed, M.
    Jassens, G.
    Orban, J.
    Park, Y. K.
    Parodi, K.
    Bentefour, E. H.
    Lu, H. M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (08) : 3049 - 3062
  • [7] Macro Monte Carlo for dose calculation of proton beams
    Fix, Michael K.
    Frei, Daniel
    Volken, Werner
    Born, Ernst J.
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Manser, Peter
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (07) : 2027 - 2044
  • [8] Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions
    Zeng, Chuan
    Giantsoudi, Drosoula
    Grassberger, Clemens
    Goldberg, Saveli
    Niemierko, Andrzej
    Paganetti, Harald
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Trofimov, Alexei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [9] Commissioning of the Mobius3D independent dose verification system for TomoTherapy
    Kodama, Takumi
    Saito, Yoshihiro
    Hatanaka, Shogo
    Hariu, Masatsugu
    Shimbo, Munefumi
    Takahashi, Takeo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (05): : 12 - 20
  • [10] Implementation of Sphinx/Lynx as daily QA equipment for scanned proton and carbon ion beams
    Grevillot, Loic
    Moreno, Jhonnatan Osorio
    Fuchs, Hermann
    Dreindl, Ralf
    Elia, Alessio
    Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta
    Stock, Markus
    Palmans, Hugo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (04):