RETRACTED: Effect of passive versus active abdominal drainage on wound infection after pancreatectomy: A meta-analysis (Retracted Article)

被引:0
作者
Han, Yanchun [1 ]
Wu, Zuowei [1 ]
Song, Jiafan [2 ]
Zhang, Qiang [1 ]
Wei, Lijuan [1 ]
Lu, Huimin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Pancreat Surg, 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med, West China Ctr Exellence Pancreatitis, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
active suction (AS); deep infection; pancreatic resection; passive gravity (PG); superficial wound infection; PREDICTIVE FACTORS; FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; RESECTION; TRIAL; RISK; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.14755
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Following pancreatic resection, there may be a variety of complications, including wound infection, haemorrhage, and abdominal infection. The placement of drainage channels during operation may decrease the chances of postoperative complications. However, what kind of drainage can decrease the rate of postoperative complications is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of both active and passive drainage for post-operation wound complications. From the beginning of the database until November 2023, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Pubmed database have been searched. The two authors collected 2524 related studies from 3 data bases for importation into Endnote software, and 8 finished trials were screened against the exclusion criteria. Passive drainage can decrease the incidence of superficial wound infection in postoperative patients with pancreas operation (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.60 p = 0.01); No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of deep infections among the two groups (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.68-3.36 p = 0.31); No statistical significance was found for the rate of haemorrhage after active drainage on the pancreas compared with that of passive drainage (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.77 p = 0.47); No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of death after operation for patients who had received a pancreas operation in active or passive drainage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.57-1.42 p = 0.65); On the basis of existing evidence, the use of passive abdominal drainage reduces postoperative surface wound infections in patients. But there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of severe complications, haemorrhage after surgery, or mortality. However, because of the limited sample size of this meta-analysis, it is necessary to have more high-quality research with a large sample size to confirm the findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Does intraoperative closed-suction drainage influence the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? [J].
Aumont, Ophelie ;
Dupre, Aurelien ;
Abjean, Adeline ;
Pereira, Bruno ;
Veziant, Julie ;
Le Roy, Bertrand ;
Pezet, Denis ;
Buc, Emmanuel ;
Gagniere, Johan .
BMC SURGERY, 2017, 17
[2]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[3]   Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection - The importance of definitions [J].
Bassi, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Molinari, E ;
Mascetta, G ;
Salvia, R ;
Falconi, M ;
Gumbs, A ;
Pederzoli, P .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 21 (01) :54-59
[4]   The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Marchegiani, Giovanni ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Sarr, Micheal ;
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Adham, Mustapha ;
Allen, Peter ;
Andersson, Roland ;
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Besselink, Marc G. ;
Conlon, Kevin ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Falconi, Massimo ;
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;
Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos ;
Fingerhut, Abe ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Hackert, Thilo ;
Izbicki, Jakob ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Neoptolemos, John P. ;
Olah, Attila ;
Schulick, Richard ;
Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ;
Takada, Tadahiro ;
Takaori, Kyoichi ;
Traverso, William ;
Vollmer, Charles ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Buehler, Marcus .
SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) :584-591
[5]  
Bassi C, 2015, ANN SURG, V261, pE99, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000577
[6]  
Cameron JL, 2006, ANN SURG, V244, P10, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
[7]   Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection [J].
Cecka, Filip ;
Jon, Bohumil ;
Skalicky, Pavel ;
Cermakova, Eva ;
Neoral, Cestmir ;
Lovecek, Martin .
SURGERY, 2018, 164 (05) :1057-1063
[8]   Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review [J].
Cecka, Filip ;
Lovecek, Martin ;
Jon, Bohumil ;
Skalicky, Pavel ;
Subrt, Zdenek ;
Neoral, Cestmir ;
Ferko, Alexander .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (40) :11458-11468
[9]   DRAPA trial - closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Cecka, Filip ;
Lovecek, Martin ;
Jon, Bohumil ;
Skalicky, Pavel ;
Subrt, Zdenek ;
Ferko, Alexander .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[10]   Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection [J].
Conlon, KC ;
Labow, D ;
Leung, D ;
Smith, A ;
Jarnagin, W ;
Coit, DG ;
Merchant, N ;
Brennan, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) :487-493