Long-term Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Modern Perspective

被引:1
作者
Lama, Daniel J. [1 ,3 ]
Thomas, Kyle [1 ]
Ferenczi, Basil [1 ]
Okunowo, Oluwatimilehin [2 ]
Lau, Clayton S. [1 ]
Yuh, Bertram E. [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol & Urol Oncol, Duarte, CA USA
[2] Beckman Res Inst City Hope, Dept Computat & Quantitat Med, Div Biostat, Duarte, CA USA
[3] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol & Urol Oncol, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 60卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Prostate-specific antigen; Robotic surgical procedures; Salvage therapy; SINGLE-INSTITUTION; CANCER; THERAPY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2023.11.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Approximately two-thirds of men who undergo primary treatment for prostate cancer (PC) will experience biochemical recurrence (BCR). Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) offers curative treatment in this disease setting and men who choose this option may avoid palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The purpose of this study was to describe long-term outcomes and patient feedback following sRARP. Methods: We reviewed data for consecutive men with biopsy-proven localized BCR who underwent sRARP and pelvic lymph node dissection at a single tertiary referral center between 2004 and 2021. Perioperative data, Clavien-Dindo complications, and functional outcomes were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate prostate-specific antigen-free (>= 0.2 ng/ml) survival (PSAFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Three Likert-type items (score 1-5) from the validated Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 were distributed to patients postoperatively. Key findings and limitations: We included 78 men, of whom 72 (92%) had undergone primary radiotherapy and six (8%) had received primary prostate ablation. Median follow-up was 10.1 yr (interquartile range 5.8-12.4). Final pathology identified >= pT3N0M0 in 35 patients (45%) and positive margins in 23 (29%). The overall complication rate was 50%. Of the 26 (33%) major (grade >= III) complications, anastomotic stricture (32%) was most common. The estimated 3-, 5-, and 10-yr survival rates were 85.6% and 80.2%, 83.5% for PSAFS (n = 11), and 74.1%, 83.5%, and 70.5% for MFS (n = 23), respectively. At last follow-up, postoperative ADT had been administered to 17 patients (22%), and 39 men (50%) remained alive a decade after sRARP. Continence and potency were maintained in 33/62 (53%) and 1/16 (6%) patients, respectively. Thirty-five respondents (45%) reported median questionnaire scores (>= 4) in favor of sRARP. Limitations include the small single-center series and a single query point for patient feedback. Conclusions and clinical implications: Long-term outcomes of sRARP suggest that the technical challenges and morbidity of the procedure are qualified by patient feedback and the opportunity to evade the morbidity and mortality of biochemically recurrent PC.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Indications, Technique and Outcomes [J].
Semerjian, Alice ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (06)
[32]   Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after carbon ion radiotherapy to the prostate [J].
Shiota, Masaki ;
Tsukahara, Shigehiro ;
Takamatsu, Dai ;
Tanegashima, Tokiyoshi ;
Ueda, Shohei ;
Blas, Leandro ;
Goto, Shunsuke ;
Kobayashi, Satoshi ;
Matsumoto, Takashi ;
Inokuchi, Junichi ;
Shioyama, Yoshiyuki ;
Eto, Masatoshi .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2024, 17 (01)
[33]   Anastomotic leaks and catheter time after salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Bandini, Marco ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 :S141-S143
[34]   Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance [J].
Zanaty, Marc ;
Ajib, Khaled ;
Zorn, Kevin ;
El-Hakim, Assaad .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) :1391-1397
[35]   Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis [J].
Lei Wang ;
Baojun Wang ;
Qing Ai ;
Yu Zhang ;
Xiangjun Lv ;
Hongzhao Li ;
Xin Ma ;
Xu Zhang .
International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 :995-1005
[36]   Early assessment of patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Choi E.Y. ;
Jeong J. ;
Kang D.I. ;
Johnson K. ;
Jang T. ;
Kim I.Y. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 4 (4) :221-227
[37]   Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy haemostasis techniques and outcomes [J].
Wald, Gal ;
Winograd, Joshua ;
Farha, Mark ;
Dudley, Vanessa ;
Hu, Jim C. .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2025, 22 (07) :407-408
[38]   Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a patient with Zinner syndrome [J].
Narozanski, Wojciech ;
Glembin, Mateusz ;
Romanowicz, Dawid .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2025, 128
[39]   Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description [J].
Kwon, Hyeok Jae ;
Kang, San ;
Rhew, Seung Ah ;
Yoon, Chang Eil ;
Shin, Dongho ;
Bang, Seokhwan ;
Moon, Hyong Woo ;
Bae, Woong Jin ;
Cho, Hyuk Jin ;
Ha, U-Syn ;
Lee, Ji Youl ;
Kim, Sae Woong ;
Hong, Sung-Hoo .
INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 65 (05) :442-450
[40]   Oncologic and patient-reported outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged ≥75 years [J].
Togashi, Kyo ;
Hatakeyama, Shingo ;
Okamoto, Teppei ;
Kojima, Yuta ;
Iwamura, Hiromichi ;
Fujita, Naoki ;
Narita, Takuma ;
Hamano, Itsuto ;
Hamaya, Tomoko ;
Yoneyama, Tohru ;
Yamamoto, Hayato ;
Yoneyama, Takahiro ;
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro ;
Ohyama, Chikara .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (10) :729.e17-729.e25