Investigation of the abortion-related experience of the providers, women, and advocators in South Korea: The neglected essential healthcare service

被引:3
作者
Moon, Juhyeon [1 ]
Oh, Rora [1 ]
Chang, Eun Jee [1 ]
Park, Jiwon [2 ]
Choe, Seung-Ah [3 ]
Kim, Saerom [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth, Seoul, South Korea
[2] UNICEF Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[3] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Gender & Hlth Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
AAAQ framework; abortion; reproductive right; South Korea;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.15054
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe decriminalization of abortions in South Korea in 2019 has not been followed by the establishment of policies ensuring access to abortion services. This study aimed to explore the current challenges and barriers for quality abortion services in the Korean healthcare system. MethodsEleven women, six healthcare providers, and 11 advocates participated in in-depth interviews in 2020. Experiences of abortion were analyzed using the modified Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability, and Quality (AAAQ) framework. ResultsWhile informal, access to surgical abortion services was possible in general. However, accessibility to services and information varied according to women's age, marital status, and physical condition. Considering that the Korean government has been reluctant to adopt proactive measures to ensure access to abortion services, the quality of abortion care in Korea remains questionable, with the mandate of male consent for abortion prevailing. The women interviewed in this study expressed dissatisfaction with their current access to and the quality of abortion services. ConclusionAbortion is an essential service that ensures the sexual and reproductive health and rights of women. Although abortion was decriminalized in Korea in 2019, it remains an informal and stigmatized service. Further research and policy efforts are required to ensure access to abortion in Korea.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 444
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2022, AB POL STAT POL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GEN COMM NO 14 RIGHT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, HIRA BIGD OP PORT WE
[4]  
Awasthi R., 2019, BENEFITS ELECT TAX A
[5]   Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Baiju, N. ;
Acharya, G. ;
D'Antonio, F. ;
Berg, R. C. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (13) :1536-1544
[6]   The microeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic consequences for abortion care-seekers [J].
Coast, Ernestina ;
Lattof, Samantha R. ;
Meulen Rodgers, Yana van der ;
Moore, Brittany ;
Poss, Cheri .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06)
[7]  
Edlund L., 2009, Son Preference, Sex Selection and Economic Development: The- ory and Evidence from South Korea
[8]   Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research [J].
Gale, Nicola K. ;
Heath, Gemma ;
Cameron, Elaine ;
Rashid, Sabina ;
Redwood, Sabi .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[9]   Induced abortions among adolescent women in rural Maharashtra, India [J].
Ganatra, B ;
Hirve, S .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2002, 10 (19) :76-85
[10]   Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research [J].
Goldsmith, Laurie J. .
QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2021, 26 (06) :2061-2076