Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review

被引:3
作者
Freitas, Gabriel Ribeiro de [1 ,2 ]
Abou, Libak [3 ]
de Lima, Aline [2 ]
Rice, Laura A. [4 ,5 ]
Ilha, Jocemar [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina UFSC, Neurosci Grad Program, Florianopolis, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Santa Catarina UDESC, Coll Hlth & Sport Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil Res Grp, Florianopolis, Brazil
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Michigan Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Appl Hlth Sci, Dept Kinesiol & Community Hlth, Urbana, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Coll Appl Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Aging & Disability, Urbana, IL USA
[6] Rua Pascoal Simone,58 Coqueiros,CEP 88080-350, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2023年 / 104卷 / 04期
关键词
Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Wheelchairs; Patient out-comes assessment; Reproducibility of results; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; WHEELED MOBILITY; SKILLS TEST; OUTCOME MEASURE; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; USERS; CAPACITY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.002
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of clinical instruments used to assess manual wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Data Sources: This systematic review was conducted according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was conducted up to December 2021 on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Biblioteca Regional de Medicina, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health databases without time restriction. Study Selection: Peer-reviewed original research articles that examined any clinical wheelchair mobility and/or skill assessment instrument among adults with SCI and reported data on at least one measurement property or described the development procedure were evaluated independently by two reviewers. Data Extraction: Data were independently extracted according to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instru-ments methodology. Measurement property results from each study were independently rated by two reviewers as sufficient, insufficient, indeter-minate, or inconsistent. The evidence for each measurement property was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low (trading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Recommendations for highly-rated instruments were performed. Data Synthesis: Twenty-nine studies with 21 instruments were identified. The methodological quality of studies ranged from insufficient to suffi-cient, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to high. Six instruments reported content validity. Reliability and construct validity were the most studied measurement properties. Structural validity and invariance for cross-cultural measurement were not reported. The highly rated instruments were the Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire. Conclusions: Although numerous instruments for assessing wheelchair mobility and/or skills among individuals with SCI were identified, not many mea-surement properties have been sufficiently established. The Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire show the current best potential to be recommended for clinical and research use. Further studies are needed to strengthen or change these recommendations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:656-72 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 672
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   The Wheelchair Skills Test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version [J].
Mountain, AD ;
Kirby, RL ;
Smith, C .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (03) :416-423
[42]   Cross-cultural validation of a Brazilian version of the adapted manual wheelchair circuit (AMWC-Brazil) [J].
Neto, Frederico Ribeiro ;
Gomes Costa, Rodrigo Rodrigues ;
Garcia Lopes, Ana Claudia ;
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz .
PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 35 (09) :860-872
[43]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906]
[44]   Reliability of the Spanish version of the wheelchair skills test 4.2 for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury [J].
Passuni, Diego ;
Dalzotto, Elisa ;
Gath, Christian F. ;
Buffetti, Eliana ;
Elizalde, Milagros ;
Jarmoluk, Veronica ;
Russo, Maria J. ;
Intruvini, Silvia ;
Olmos, Lisandro E. ;
Freixes, Orestes .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (08) :788-791
[45]   Services for spinal cord injured: Availability and satisfaction [J].
Post, MWM ;
vanAsbeck, FWA ;
vanDijk, AJ ;
Schrijvers, AJP .
SPINAL CORD, 1997, 35 (02) :109-115
[46]   COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures [J].
Prinsen, C. A. C. ;
Mokkink, L. B. ;
Bouter, L. M. ;
Alonso, J. ;
Patrick, D. L. ;
de Vet, H. C. W. ;
Terwee, C. B. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (05) :1147-1157
[47]   The addition of three new items in the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit improves the discrimination between different levels of spinal cord injury [J].
Ribeiro Neto, Frederico ;
Costa, Rodrigo Rodrigues Gomes ;
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz .
PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 36 (12) :1329-1339
[48]   Reliability and construct validity studies of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance [J].
Routhier, F ;
Desrosiers, J ;
Vincent, C ;
Nadeau, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2005, 28 (01) :49-56
[49]  
Schunemann H, 2013, GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations
[50]   Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users [J].
Stanley, RK ;
Stafford, DJ ;
Rasch, E ;
Rodgers, MM .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 40 (04) :301-307