Transferability of Covariates to Predict Soil Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils

被引:19
作者
Broeg, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Blaschek, Michael [3 ]
Seitz, Steffen [2 ]
Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah [2 ,4 ]
Zepp, Simone [5 ]
Scholten, Thomas [2 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Thunen Inst Farm Econ, Bundesallee 63, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Geosci Soil Sci & Geomorphol, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
[3] State Author Geol Resources & Min, Albertstr 5, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Tubingen, CRC 1070 Ressource Culture, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
[5] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, German Remote Sensing Data Ctr DFD, Muenchener Str 20, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
[6] Univ Tubingen, DFG Cluster Excellence Machine Learning, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
machine learning; digital soil mapping; soil organic carbon; model transfer; extrapolation; soil reflectance composite; legacy soil maps; Baden-Wurttemberg; Bavaria; SPATIAL PREDICTION; EXTRAPOLATION; GERMANY;
D O I
10.3390/rs15040876
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Precise knowledge about the soil organic carbon (SOC) content in cropland soils is one requirement to design and execute effective climate and food policies. In digital soil mapping (DSM), machine learning algorithms are used to predict soil properties from covariates derived from traditional soil mapping, digital elevation models, land use, and Earth observation (EO). However, such DSM models are trained for a specific dataset and region and have so far only allowed limited general statements to be made that would enable the models to be transferred to different regions. In this study, we test the transferability of SOC models for cropland soils using five different covariate groups: multispectral soil reflectance composites (satellite), soil legacy data (soil), digital elevation model derivatives (terrain), climate parameters (climate), and combined models (combined). The transferability was analyzed using data from two federal states in southern Germany: Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg. First, baseline models were trained for each state with combined models performing best in both cases (R-2 = 0.68/0.48). Next, the models were transferred and tested with soil samples from the other state whose data were not used during model calibration. Only satellite and combined models were transferable, but accuracy declined in both cases. In the final step, models were trained with samples from both states (mixed-data models) and applied to each state separately. This process significantly improved the accuracies of satellite, terrain, and combined models, while it showed no effect on climate models and decreased the models based on soil covariates. The experiment underlines the importance of EO for the transfer and extrapolation of DSM models.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Ad-hoc-Arbeitsgruppe Boden, 2006, BODENKUNDLICHE KARTI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, BGR BODENUBERSICHTSK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, BGR GRUPPEN BODENAUS
[4]  
Behrens T, 2007, DEV SOIL SCI, V31, P353
[5]   Spatial modelling with Euclidean distance fields and machine learning [J].
Behrens, T. ;
Schmidt, K. ;
Rossel, R. A. Viscarra ;
Gries, P. ;
Scholten, T. ;
MacMillan, R. A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2018, 69 (05) :757-770
[6]   Multiscale contextual spatial modelling with the Gaussian scale space [J].
Behrens, T. ;
Schmidt, K. ;
MacMillan, R. A. ;
Rossel, R. A. Viscarra .
GEODERMA, 2018, 310 :128-137
[7]  
BGR, 2001, GEOM EINH BUND DTSCH
[8]  
BGR, 2021, GEOL UB BUND DTSCH 1
[9]   Forest tree species distribution for Europe 2000-2020: mapping potential and realized distributions using spatiotemporal machine learning [J].
Bonannella, Carmelo ;
Hengl, Tomislav ;
Heisig, Johannes ;
Parente, Leandro ;
Wright, Marvin N. ;
Herold, Martin ;
de Bruin, Sytze .
PEERJ, 2022, 10
[10]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32