Laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute complications after appendectomy: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Weber, Gabriel [1 ]
Harriott, Camila Bras [1 ]
Casas, Maria A. [1 ]
Sadava, Emmanuel E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Aleman Buenos Aires, Dept Surg, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Hosp Aleman Buenos Aires, Dept Surg, 1640 Pueyrredon Ave, Buenos Aires, Argentina
来源
MINERVA SURGERY | 2023年 / 78卷 / 04期
关键词
Laparoscopy; Appendicitis; Abdominal abscess; Appendectomy; Postoperative complications;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09835-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The significance of laparoscopy after appendectomy is still unclear, despite the fact that it is thought to be an appropriate technique for the detection and management of postoperative complications. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute complications after appendectomy performing a systematic review of the literature.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and GoogleScholar bibliographic databases between 1995 and 2022 regarding laparoscopic resolution of early postoperative complications after appendectomy. Demographics, peri-operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 9 studies comprising 116 cases of laparoscopic resolution of early complications after appendectomy were included. The primary surgery showed a 60% of perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. Time elapse between the appendectomy and the diagnosis of the postoperative complication was from 2 to 15 days (median 5.8 days). The procedures performed at laparoscopy were as follows: laparoscopic washout and drainage of generalized peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscesses (95.6%), laparoscopic lysis of adhesions due to small bowel obstruction (1.7%), running suturing for unnoticed small bowel lesion (1.7%) and one patient required a right colectomy due to stump leakage (0.8%). Conversion to an open approach was necessary in 9 patients (7.8%). Postoperative complications after early re-laparoscopy washout were reported in 4 publications (15.5%). Finally, 15 (12.9%) patients required an additional intervention. The mean LOS was of 5 days.CONCLUSIONS: Infectious complications are not uncommon after appendectomy, but their incidence increases significantly in complicated appendicitis, with IAA being the most feared complication. When re-exploration is mandatory, the laparoscopic approach is a safe and highly effective tool for the diagnosis and treatment of these complications, adding the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications After Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Perforated Appendicitis of Children
    Uysal, Mehmet
    Kucukaydin, Mustafa
    Ciftler, Ahmet Necip
    Arslan, Serkan
    Aslan, Ali
    ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 33 (02) : 117 - 120
  • [2] Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Henriksen, Siri R.
    Christophersen, Camilla
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    Fonnes, Siv
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [3] Varying negative appendectomy rates after laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Siri R. Henriksen
    Camilla Christophersen
    Jacob Rosenberg
    Siv Fonnes
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [4] Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis
    Shin, Jiyoung
    Ihn, Myong Hoon
    Kim, Kyung Sik
    Kim, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Jihyoun
    Yun, Sangchul
    Cho, Sung Woo
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 39 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [5] Retained appendicolith after laparoscopic appendectomy: the need for systematic double ligature of the appendiceal base
    Guillem, P
    Mulliez, E
    Proye, C
    Pattou, F
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (04): : 717 - 718
  • [6] Retained appendicolith after laparoscopic appendectomy: the need for systematic double ligature of the appendiceal base
    P. Guillem
    E. Mulliez
    C. Proye
    F. Pattou
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18 : 717 - 718
  • [7] The suprapubic approach for laparoscopic appendectomy
    Kollmar, O
    Z'graggen, K
    Schilling, MK
    Buchholz, BM
    Büchler, MW
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (03): : 504 - 508
  • [8] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopy in adults. A systematic review
    Moraga Concha, Javier Alejandro
    Cartes-Velasquez, Ricardo
    Manterola Delgado, Carlos
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2014, 29 (12) : 826 - 831
  • [9] Transvaginal Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review
    Slouha, Ethan
    Biput, Stefan J.
    Krumbach, Brandon
    Clunes, Lucy A.
    Kollias, Theofanis F.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [10] l Infective Complications Seen after Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy
    Hasbahceci, Mustafa
    Acar, Aylin
    Basak, Fatih
    Tumerdem, Sahap
    Alimoglu, Orhan
    ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (03): : 160 - 163