Quantifying Clinical Trial Diversity in Pivotal Registration Trials of FDA Novel Drug Approvals

被引:1
作者
Idris, Muhammed Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fitzsimmons, William E. [3 ,4 ]
Pemu, Priscilla [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
[2] Morehouse Sch Med, Clin Res Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm & Med, 833 S Wood St, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[4] CARER Grp, Catalyzing Access Res Equ Representat, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Clinical trials; Diversity; Equity; FDA; Novel drugs; Pivotal trials;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-023-00583-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHealth care inequity includes the lack of adequate representation of various populations in clinical trials. Government, academic and industry organizations have highlighted these issues and committed to actions to improve. In order to assess the current status and future success of these initiatives a quantitative objective measure to assess the state of clinical trial diversity is needed.MethodsFDA review documents for all novel drug approvals from January 2022 through March 2023 were assessed using a scorecard that considers diversity across different demographic subgroups including age (>= 65 years old), sex (female), race (Black and Asian) and ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino). The scorecard assigns each drug a letter grade, between A and F, for each subgroup (and overall) based on (1) the percent of each sub-population included in the trials and grades relative to the percent of the US population per the 2020 Census, (2) the number of participants from each subpopulation that received the novel new drug in the trials, (3) the incidence or prevalence of the disease/condition in each of the sub-populations.ResultsThe FDA approved 49 novel new drugs for 50 indications (one drug was simultaneously approved for two indications). There was good representation of elderly and females with only two drugs receiving a D grade in either of these sub-populations. In contrast, Black (5 F grades) and Hispanic (4 F grades) representation was often inadequate. There were 10 drugs (20.0%) where there were no Black participants receiving the novel new drug and 16 (32.0%) approvals where there were 1-9 Black participants receiving the novel drug. In the Hispanic/Latino population there were 4 (8.0%) approvals with no Hispanic participants receiving the novel drug and 15 (30.0%) approvals where there were 1-9 Hispanic participants receiving the drug.ConclusionsThis scorecard provides an objective quantitative approach to assess the current state of diversity in clinical trials supporting new drug approvals. Substantial improvement in racial and ethnic representation is needed. Meaningful change will require actions and cooperation among all stakeholders to address this multifaceted issue and will take commitment, perseverance, and appropriate incentives.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, HR2617 CONSOLIDATED
  • [2] [Anonymous], SURV EP END REPROG
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, Federal Register, V87
  • [4] [Anonymous], US CENSUS BUREAU QUI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, A Guideline on Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) [Internet]
  • [6] BibbinsDomingo K., 2022, Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups
  • [7] A Data Infrastructure for Clinical Trial Diversity
    Blumenthal, David
    James, Cara V.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 386 (25) : 2355 - 2356
  • [8] Braithwaite RL, 2020, The Morehouse model: How one school of medicine revolutionized community engagement and health equity, DOI [10.1353/book.75006, DOI 10.1353/BOOK.75006]
  • [9] If Nothing Goes Wrong, Is Everything All Right? Why We Should Be Wary of Zero Numerators
    Burns, Jeffrey
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (02) : 198 - 199
  • [10] Foreword
    Clark, Luther T.
    Watkins, Laurence
    Pina, Ileana L.
    Elmer, Mary
    Akinboboye, Ola
    Gorham, Millicent
    Jamerson, Brenda
    McCullough, Cassandra A.
    Pierre, Christine
    Polis, Adam B.
    Puckrein, Gary A.
    Regnante, Jeanne M.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (05) : 144 - 172