Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision-making framework for identifying regions vulnerable to transmission of COVID-19 pandemic
    Gupta, Rohit
    Rathore, Bhawana
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Biswas, Baidyanath
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 169
  • [32] Barriers analysis for reverse logistics in Thailand's palm oil industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for prioritizing the solutions
    Phochanikorn, Patchara
    Tan, Chunqiao
    Chen, Wen
    GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2020, 5 (04) : 419 - 436
  • [33] Investigating the barriers to Quality 4.0 adoption in the Indian manufacturing sector: insights and implications for industry and policy-making
    Ghatak, Ranjit Roy
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 41 (06) : 1623 - 1656
  • [34] Reverse logistics disposition decision-making Developing a decision framework via content analysis
    Hazen, Benjamin T.
    Hall, Dianne J.
    Hanna, Joe B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 42 (03) : 244 - 274
  • [35] A Guide to an Iterative Approach to Model-Based Decision Making in Health and Medicine: An Iterative Decision-Making Framework
    Kunst, Natalia
    Burger, Emily A.
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Aas, Eline
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2024, 42 (04) : 363 - 371
  • [36] Awareness of strategy execution barriers in decision-making process: moderated mediation analysis
    Radomska, Joanna
    Kozyra, Cyprian
    DECISION, 2020, 47 (01) : 61 - 78
  • [37] Exploring Barriers to Innovative Marketing in MSMEs: An Analysis Using a BWM-ISM Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework
    Mondal, Sourav
    Singh, Saumya
    Gupta, Himanshu
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2025, 32 (01)
  • [38] Barriers and Facilitators to Shared Decision-making Among African-Americans with Diabetes
    Peek, Monica E.
    Wilson, Shannon C.
    Gorawara-Bhat, Rita
    Odoms-Young, Angela
    Quinn, Michael T.
    Chin, Marshall H.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (10) : 1135 - 1139
  • [39] Barriers to adopting automated organisational decision-making through the use of artificial intelligence
    Booyse, Dawid
    Scheepers, Caren Brenda
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01): : 64 - 85
  • [40] Women in household decision-making and implications for dietary quality in Bhutan
    Sariyev, Orkhan
    Loos, Tim K.
    Zeller, Manfred
    Gurung, Tulsi
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD ECONOMICS, 2020, 8 (01)