Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation and ranking of solutions to overcome the barriers of Industry 4.0 enabled sustainable food supply chain adoption
    Lahane, Swapnil
    Paliwal, Vishal
    Kant, Ravi
    CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, 2023, 8
  • [22] Prioritizing the Solutions to Overcome Lean Six Sigma 4.0 Challenges in SMEs: A Contemporary Research Framework to Enhance Business Operations
    Singh, Priyanshu Kumar
    Maheswaran, R.
    Virmani, Naveen
    Raut, Rakesh D. D.
    Muduli, Kamalakanta
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [23] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Covvey, Jordan R.
    Kamal, Khalid M.
    Gorse, Erin E.
    Mehta, Zumi
    Dhumal, Trupti
    Heidari, Elham
    Rao, Deepika
    Zacker, Christopher
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) : 1613 - 1637
  • [24] A Conceptual Framework to Support Decision-Making in Remanufacturing Engineering Processes
    Alghamdi, Awn
    Prickett, Paul
    Setchi, Rossitza
    SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING 2017, 2017, 68 : 222 - 232
  • [25] BARRIERS TO DATA-DRIVEN DECISION-MAKING AMONG ONLINE RETAILERS
    Kemppainen, Tiina
    Frank, Lauri
    Makkonen, Markus
    Kallio, Antti
    35TH BLED ECONFERENCE DIGITAL RESTRUCTURING AND HUMAN (RE)ACTION, BLED ECONFERENCE 2022, 2022, : 327 - 342
  • [26] A framework based on fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for prioritizing solutions to overcome the barriers in the implementation of ecodesign practices in SMEs
    Singh, P. K.
    Sarkar, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 506 - 521
  • [27] Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example
    Cihat Öztürk
    Abdullah Yildizbaşi
    Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 14771 - 14789
  • [28] Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example
    Ozturk, Cihat
    Yildizbasi, Abdullah
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (19) : 14771 - 14789
  • [29] Data Asset Quality Evaluation Framework Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method
    Xu, Tao
    You, Xiaoyue
    Yang, Miying
    Shi, Yongjiang
    Mao, Renjie
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 41 (02) : 801 - 820
  • [30] DevOps project management success factors: A decision-making framework
    Akbar, Muhammad Azeem
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Islam, Najmul
    Mahmood, Sajjad
    SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2024, 54 (02) : 257 - 280