Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A decision-making framework for determinants of an organisation's readiness for smart warehouse
    Ali, Sadia Samar
    Kaur, Rajbir
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Ahmad, Zulfiqar
    Jebahi, Khaled
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2024, 35 (14) : 1887 - 1908
  • [12] Construction 4.0 Technologies and Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis
    Shafei, Hazwani
    Radzi, Afiqah R.
    Algahtany, Mohammed
    Rahman, Rahimi A.
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [13] A Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Route Selection in Multimodal Transportation Networks
    Koohathongsumrit, Nitidetch
    Meethom, Warapoj
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 34 (04) : 689 - 704
  • [14] Quality Decision-Making through the Systems Reliability
    Tofan, Cezarina Adina
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2014, 15 (142): : 72 - 77
  • [15] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Boland, Laura
    Graham, Ian D.
    Legare, France
    Lewis, Krystina
    Jull, Janet
    Shephard, Allyson
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Davis, Alexandra
    Yameogo, Audrey
    Stacey, Dawn
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [16] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Laura Boland
    Ian D. Graham
    France Légaré
    Krystina Lewis
    Janet Jull
    Allyson Shephard
    Margaret L. Lawson
    Alexandra Davis
    Audrey Yameogo
    Dawn Stacey
    Implementation Science, 14
  • [17] A multi-aspect framework to support the decision-making process of low carbon emission solutions
    Son Nguyen
    WMU JOURNAL OF MARITIME AFFAIRS, 2019, 18 (01) : 165 - 195
  • [18] Decision-making in smart manufacturing: A framework for performance measurement
    Parhi, Shreyanshu
    Joshi, Kanchan
    Akarte, Milind
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2023, 36 (02) : 190 - 218
  • [19] A Revised Adaptive Decision-Making Framework for Rangeland Management 
    Smith, Ada P.
    Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
    Metcalf, Alexander L.
    Yung, Laurie
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 91 : 30 - 43
  • [20] An optimization framework for building energy retrofits decision-making
    Jafari, Amirhosein
    Valentin, Vanessa
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 115 : 118 - 129