Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A framework for prioritizing the solutions to overcome sustainable manufacturing barriers
    Malek, Javed
    Desai, Tushar N.
    CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, 2021, 1
  • [2] A systematic decision-making framework for tackling quantum software engineering challenges
    Akbar, Muhammad Azeem
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Rafi, Saima
    AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2023, 30 (02)
  • [3] A SPHERICAL FUZZY BASED DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK WITH EINSTEIN AGGREGATION FOR COMPARING PREPAREDNESS OF SMEs IN QUALITY 4.0
    Biswas, Sanjib
    Bozanic, Darko
    Pamu, Dragan
    Marinkovic, Dragan
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 21 (03) : 453 - 478
  • [4] A multicriteria decision-making framework for assessing the performance of gynecobstetrics departments: a case study
    Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
    Gutierrez-Severiche, Edward
    Combita-Nino, Dayana
    Jimenez-Delgado, Genett
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Barbati, Maria
    Herrera-Fontalvo, Zulmeira
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (01) : 328 - 368
  • [5] A Decision-Making Framework for Subcontractor Selection in Construction Projects
    Abbasianjahromi, Hamidreza
    Sepehri, Mehran
    Abbasi, Omid
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 30 (02) : 141 - 152
  • [6] Assessing the impact of enterprise resource planning on decision-making quality An empirical study
    Ouiddad, Ahmed
    Okar, Chafik
    Chroqui, Razane
    Beqqali Hassani, Imane
    KYBERNETES, 2021, 50 (05) : 1144 - 1162
  • [7] Quality management framework for public management decision making
    Yu, Billy T. W.
    To, W. M.
    Lee, Peter K. C.
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2012, 50 (3-4) : 420 - 438
  • [8] Quality and structure of organizational decision-making
    Ben-Yashar, R
    Nitzan, S
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 36 (04) : 521 - 534
  • [9] Shared decision-making in Israel: status, barriers, and recommendations
    Miron-Shatz, Talya
    Golan, Ofra
    Brezis, Mayer
    Siegal, Gil
    Doniger, Glen M.
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2012, 1
  • [10] Practical solutions for making models indispensable in conservation decision-making
    Addison, Prue F. E.
    Rumpff, Libby
    Bau, S. Sana
    Carey, Janet M.
    Chee, Yung En
    Jarrad, Frith C.
    McBride, Marissa F.
    Burgman, Mark A.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2013, 19 (5-6) : 490 - 502