Digital mapping of cultivated land soil organic matter in hill-mountain and plain regions

被引:0
作者
Xie, Hongxia [1 ]
Li, Weiyou [1 ]
Duan, Liangxia [1 ]
Yuan, Hong [1 ]
Zhou, Qing [1 ]
Luo, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Du, Huihui [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Changsha 410127, Peoples R China
[2] Dept Agr & Rural Affairs Hunan Prov, Soil & Fertilizer Workstn, Changsha 410127, Peoples R China
关键词
Soil organic matter; Spatial prediction; Digital soil mapping; Sampling density optimization; Random forest; SAMPLING STRATEGIES; RANDOM FOREST; CARBON; VARIABILITY; ACCURACY; STOCKS;
D O I
10.1007/s11368-023-03633-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Spatial prediction of soil organic matter (SOM) in cultivated land is crucial for evaluating soil productivity and its role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Cultivated soils in mountainous regions are commonly scattered on the footslope whereas those in the plain regions are continuously planar distributed; hence, they are quite different in the degree of variation in soil-forming factors and thereby the soil properties including SOM. Materials and methods In this study, we used the digital soil mapping approach (DSM) to predict SOM (0-20 cm) in cultivated soils in a hill-mountain region, Longshan County (LS), and a plain-platform region, Nanxian County (NX), which are both located at the same latitude in Southern China. By using 6746 and 9571 soil sampling points for LS and NX, respectively, together with 33 environmental covariates, the optimal spatial interpolation models and the reasonable sample strategy were carefully discussed. Results and discussion Descriptive statistical results showed that SOM in LS and NX were both moderate variations (coefficient variation, 0.34) and were approximately normal distribution. SOM in NX was strongly spatially dependent while SOM in LS was a moderate spatial dependence. The conditional Latin hypercube sampling (cLHS) was more appropriate compared with the Simple Random Sampling (SRS) as the sampling strategy. The optimal model for predicting cultivated land SOM was the Random Forest (RF) model for both LS and NX. The prediction accuracy was positively correlated with the sampling density. Specifically, to obtain a high prediction accuracy, the reasonable sampling density for SOM in LS should be controlled at >= 4.0 per km(2), higher than that in NX (>= 2.0 per km(2)). Conclusions The combination of cLHS and the RF model probably is the best choice for cultivated land SOM spatial prediction in different terrains. Therefore, our results provide a basis for future DSM of SOM in similar regions and help optimize soil sampling density.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 360
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Identification of representative samples from existing samples for digital soil mapping
    An Yiming
    Yang Lin
    Zhu A-Xing
    Qin Chengzhi
    Shi JingJing
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2018, 311 : 109 - 119
  • [2] A global overview of studies about land management, land-use change, and climate change effects on soil organic carbon
    Beillouin, Damien
    Cardinael, Remi
    Berre, David
    Boyer, Annie
    Corbeels, Marc
    Fallot, Abigail
    Feder, Frederic
    Demenois, Julien
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (04) : 1690 - 1702
  • [3] Sampling Designs for Validating Digital Soil Maps: A Review
    Biswas, Asim
    Zhang, Yakun
    [J]. PEDOSPHERE, 2018, 28 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [4] Sampling for validation of digital soil maps
    Brus, D. J.
    Kempen, B.
    Heuvelink, G. B. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2011, 62 (03) : 394 - 407
  • [5] Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion)
    Brus, DJ
    deGruijter, JJ
    [J]. GEODERMA, 1997, 80 (1-2) : 1 - 44
  • [6] OPTIMAL INTERPOLATION AND ISARITHMIC MAPPING OF SOIL PROPERTIES .1. THE SEMI-VARIOGRAM AND PUNCTUAL KRIGING
    BURGESS, TM
    WEBSTER, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1980, 31 (02): : 315 - 331
  • [7] FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS
    CAMBARDELLA, CA
    MOORMAN, TB
    NOVAK, JM
    PARKIN, TB
    KARLEN, DL
    TURCO, RF
    KONOPKA, AE
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (05) : 1501 - 1511
  • [8] Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? - Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature
    Chai, T.
    Draxler, R. R.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (03) : 1247 - 1250
  • [9] RELATION BETWEEN THE NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX AND ECOLOGICAL VARIABLES
    CIHLAR, J
    STLAURENT, L
    DYER, JA
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 35 (2-3) : 279 - 298
  • [10] Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in grasslands: implications for detecting change at different scales
    Conant, RT
    Paustian, K
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2002, 116 : S127 - S135