Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles' lithium-ion batteries reused for energy storage

被引:61
作者
Fan, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liang, Weicheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Feng, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Hubei Key Lab Adv Technol Automot Components, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Hubei Collaborat Innovat Ctr Automot Components Te, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ Technol, Hubei Res Ctr New Energy & Intelligent Connected V, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ Technol, Inst Adv Mat & Mfg Technol, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[5] SAIC GM Wuling Automobile Co Ltd, Liuzhou 545007, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lithium-ion batteries; Lead-acid batteries; Life cycle assessment; Secondary use; Energy storage system; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2023.108126
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Energy storage batteries are part of renewable energy generation applications to ensure their operation. At present, the primary energy storage batteries are lead-acid batteries (LABs), which have the problems of low energy density and short cycle lives. With the development of new energy vehicles, an increasing number of retired lithium-ion batteries need disposal urgently. Retired lithium-ion batteries still retain about 80 % of their capacity, which can be used in energy storage systems to avoid wasting energy. In this paper, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries, which are commonly used in electric vehicles, and lead-acid batteries, which are commonly used in energy storage systems were taken as the research objects. The environmental impacts of their full life cycles were compared, and the sensitivity analysis of the key parts in the battery production phase and the data with major contributions were carried out through the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The results show that the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries in the production phase are higher than lead-acid batteries. However, they have lower environmental impacts in the use phase because of their higher charging and discharging efficiency. In general, the environmental performance of LFP batteries is better, especially in carbon emission, soil acidification, and abiotic resource depletion. Lead-acid batteries have more advantages in ozone loss, ecotoxicity, and eutrophication. The production phase contributes the most to various environmental impacts, which can be alleviated through recycling. The recycling of NCM batteries has better environmental benefits. The physical recycling technology of LFP batteries is better than hydrometallurgy in terms of ecotoxicity and eutrophication, but it has negative effects on some environmental indicators. Secondary utilization can avoid the high energy consumption and high emission process of battery production and achieve the purpose of environmental protection. According to the results, discarded lithium-ion batteries can be reused to maximize the value of batteries, which will also promote the development of clean electricity to a certain extent and further reduce the burden on the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems [J].
Ahmadi, Leila ;
Young, Steven B. ;
Fowler, Michael ;
Fraser, Roydon A. ;
Achachlouei, Mohammad Ahmadi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (01) :111-124
[2]   Energy efficiency of Li-ion battery packs re-used in stationary power applications [J].
Ahmadi, Leila ;
Fowler, Michael ;
Young, Steven B. ;
Fraser, Roydon A. ;
Gaffney, Ben ;
Walker, Sean B. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2014, 8 :9-17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, About us
[4]  
[Anonymous], About Us
[5]   Waste battery treatment options: Comparing their environmental performance [J].
Briffaerts, K. ;
Spirinckx, C. ;
Van der Linden, A. ;
Vrancken, K. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (08) :2321-2331
[6]   Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Storage Systems within the Italian Electric Network [J].
Carvalho, Maria Leonor ;
Temporelli, Andrea ;
Girardi, Pierpaolo .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (08)
[7]   Lead-acid battery use in the development of renewable energy systems in China [J].
Chang, Yu ;
Mao, Xianxian ;
Zhao, Yanfang ;
Feng, Shaoli ;
Chen, Hongyu ;
Finlow, David .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2009, 191 (01) :176-183
[8]   Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review [J].
Chen, Haisheng ;
Cong, Thang Ngoc ;
Yang, Wei ;
Tan, Chunqing ;
Li, Yongliang ;
Ding, Yulong .
PROGRESS IN NATURAL SCIENCE-MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 19 (03) :291-312
[9]   Recycling End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries [J].
Chen, Mengyuan ;
Ma, Xiaotu ;
Chen, Bin ;
Arsenault, Renata ;
Karlson, Peter ;
Simon, Nakia ;
Wang, Yan .
JOULE, 2019, 3 (11) :2622-2646
[10]   Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage systems [J].
Denholm, P ;
Kulcinski, GL .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (13-14) :2153-2172