Inherent safety of clean fuels for maritime transport

被引:15
作者
Zanobetti, Francesco [1 ]
Pio, Gianmaria [1 ]
Jafarzadeh, Sepideh [2 ]
Ortiz, Miguel Munoz [3 ]
Cozzani, Valerio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn, LISES Lab Ind Safety & Environm Sustainabil, Via Terracini 28, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
[2] SINTEF Ocean, Torgarden 4762, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF Ind, Torgarden 4760, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Clean technologies; Clean fuels; Inherent safety; Inherently safer design; Maritime transportation; Safety in energy transition; KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; EARLY DESIGN; HYDROGEN; INDEX; GAS; TECHNOLOGIES; METHODOLOGY; EMISSIONS; ROUTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2023.05.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The urgent need to reduce the emission of harmful pollutants in maritime transport promoted the development of several alternative propulsion systems based on clean fuels or carbon-neutral energy vectors. However, the alternative solutions under development pose new concerns from the safety perspective. Thus, an innovative methodology to rank the inherent safety performance of alternative systems at early design stages was devel-oped. A case study representative of long-distance maritime transportation was analysed. The inherent safety performances of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Liquid Hydrogen (LH2), and Liquid Ammonia (LNH3) were compared to that of Marine Gas Oil (MGO), assumed as a benchmark representing state-of-the-art technologies. Uncertainty and robustness of the safety ranking obtained were tested via a Monte Carlo analysis. The results show that technologies based on LNG have similar safety performances with respect to the benchmark option. Conversely, LH2 safety performance is currently limited by the lack of mature technologies for its safe storage whilst the safety of LNH3-based applications is affected by the toxicity of ammonia.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1055
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]  
EDWARDS DW, 1993, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V71, P252
[22]  
European Environment Agency, 2021, European Maritime Transport Environmental Report 2021
[23]   Quantitative risk assessment for ammonia ship-to-ship bunkering based on Bayesian network [J].
Fan, Hongjun ;
Enshaei, Hossein ;
Jayasinghe, Shantha Gamini ;
Tan, Sock Hua ;
Zhang, Chunchang .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2022, 41 (02) :395-410
[24]   Evaluating the potential for overpressures from the ignition of an LNG vapor cloud during offloading [J].
Gavelli, Filippo ;
Davis, Scott G. ;
Hansen, Olav R. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (06) :908-915
[25]  
Heikkila A.M., 1999, INHERENT SAFETY PROC
[26]   Sustainability of cruise ship fuel systems: Comparison among LNG and diesel technologies [J].
Iannaccone, Tommaso ;
Landucci, Gabriele ;
Tugnoli, Alessandro ;
Salzano, Ernesto ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 260
[27]   Inherent safety assessment of alternative technologies for LNG ships bunkering [J].
Iannaccone, Tommaso ;
Landucci, Gabriele ;
Scarponi, Giordano Emrys ;
Bonvicini, Sarah ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 185 :100-114
[28]   Accident risk-based life cycle assessment methodology for green and safe fuel selection [J].
Khalezad, Sina ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Abbassi, Rouzbeh ;
Khakzad, Nima .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 109 :268-287
[29]   Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making [J].
Khan, FI ;
Sadiq, R ;
Veitch, B .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2004, 12 (01) :59-76
[30]   GreenPro-I:: a risk-based life cycle assessment and decision-making methodology for process plant design [J].
Khan, FI ;
Sadiq, R ;
Husain, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2002, 17 (08) :669-692