Machine learning and Bayesian inference in nuclear fusion research: an overview

被引:25
作者
Pavone, A. [1 ]
Merlo, A. [1 ]
Kwak, S. [1 ]
Svensson, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, Wendelsteinstr 1, D-17491 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
machine learning; Bayesian inference; neural networks; nuclear fusion; deep learning; data analysis; DISRUPTION PREDICTOR; MAGNETIC CONTROL; NEURAL-NETWORKS; TOKAMAK; PHYSICS; JET; MITIGATION; FRAMEWORK; PLASMAS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6587/acc60f
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
This article reviews applications of Bayesian inference and machine learning (ML) in nuclear fusion research. Current and next-generation nuclear fusion experiments require analysis and modelling efforts that integrate different models consistently and exploit information found across heterogeneous data sources in an efficient manner. Model-based Bayesian inference provides a framework well suited for the interpretation of observed data given physics and probabilistic assumptions, also for very complex systems, thanks to its rigorous and straightforward treatment of uncertainties and modelling hypothesis. On the other hand, ML, in particular neural networks and deep learning models, are based on black-box statistical models and allow the handling of large volumes of data and computation very efficiently. For this reason, approaches which make use of ML and Bayesian inference separately and also in conjunction are of particular interest for today's experiments and are the main topic of this review. This article also presents an approach where physics-based Bayesian inference and black-box ML play along, mitigating each other's drawbacks: the former is made more efficient, the latter more interpretable.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 187 条
[1]   Data-driven profile prediction for DIII-D [J].
Abbate, J. ;
Conlin, R. ;
Kolemen, E. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2021, 61 (04)
[2]  
Abdolmaleki A, 2018, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1812.02256, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1812.02256]
[3]  
Amrouche S, 2020, SPRING SER CHALLENGE, P231, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-29135-8_9
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1961, PRINCIPLES NEURODYNA, DOI DOI 10.1038/S41586-020-2258-0
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FIELD GUIDE DYNAMICA
[6]   A Bayesian model of filamentary dynamics in MAST [J].
Appel, L. C. ;
Kwak, S. ;
Militello, F. ;
Svensson, J. .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2020, 62 (12)
[7]  
Bahri Y, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2102.06701
[8]   Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations [J].
Bau, David ;
Zhou, Bolei ;
Khosla, Aditya ;
Oliva, Aude ;
Torralba, Antonio .
30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2017), 2017, :3319-3327
[9]   Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, H ;
Henrick, K ;
Nakamura, H .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (12) :980-980
[10]  
Bingham E., 2001, KDD-2001. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P245, DOI 10.1145/502512.502546