MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY OF BRČKO HOSPITAL'S MEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT TREATMENT

被引:2
作者
Puska, Adis [1 ]
Beganovic, Allen Popovic [2 ]
Stilic, Andelka [3 ]
Beganovic, Admir [4 ]
Bozanic, Darko [5 ]
机构
[1] Govt Brcko Dist, Dept Publ Safety, Brcko, Bosnia & Herceg
[2] European Univ Kallos Tuzla, Fac Med, Marshal Tito 2A-2B, Tuzla 75000, Bosnia & Herceg
[3] Acad Appl Studies Belgrade, Coll Tourism, Bulevar Zorana Dindica 152a, Belgrade 11070, Serbia
[4] European Univ Brcko, Fac Econ, Bijeljina Rd 72-74, Brcko 76100, Bosnia & Herceg
[5] Univ Def Belgrade, Mil Acad, Veljka Luk Kurjaka 33, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | 2023年 / 22卷 / 12期
关键词
autoclave; fuzzy methods; medical waste; medical waste treatments; microwave; TECHNOLOGY; ALTERNATIVES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.30638/eemj.2023.184
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research was to evaluate which medical waste treatment would benefit Br & ccaron;ko Hospital the most by using multicriteria decision-making, combining extended sustainability criteria with technical criteria. Six medical waste treatments were observed using these criteria. The evaluation was conducted through expert group decision-making and linguistic evaluations. These evaluations were converted into fuzzy numbers and assessed using the IMF SWARA (Improved Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and fuzzy WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) methods. The weights of the criteria were determined using the IMF SWARA method, revealing that the ecological criteria carried the greatest weight. Fuzzy WASPAS was employed to rank the treatments, and the results indicated that the microwave and autoclave treatments showed the best indicators. This conclusion was supported by validating the research findings using six additional fuzzy methods and conducting sensitivity analysis. According to the research conducted, it is necessary to first treat medical waste and then dispose of it in the prescribed manner to reduce the impact on the environment and the health of living beings.
引用
收藏
页码:2139 / 2155
页数:216
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]   A novel framework for selecting sustainable healthcare waste treatment technologies under Z-number environment [J].
Chen, Xiaohong ;
Lin, Jiong ;
Li, Xihua ;
Ma, Zhiyong .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (09) :2032-2045
[12]   Sustainable waste management of medical waste in African developing countries: A narrative review [J].
Chisholm, Jade Megan ;
Zamani, Reza ;
Negm, Abdelazim M. ;
Said, Noha ;
Daiem, Mahmoud M. Abdel ;
Dibaj, Mahdieh ;
Akrami, Mohammad .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (09) :1149-1163
[13]   IMPACT OF THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON TRAFFIC SAFETY: MULTIPHASE MODELING [J].
Damjanovic, Milanko ;
Stevic, Zeljko ;
Stanimirovic, Dragan ;
Tanackov, Ilija ;
Marinkovic, Dragan .
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (01) :177-197
[14]   COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare solid waste management strategy-A mini-review [J].
Das, Atanu Kumar ;
Islam, Md. Nazrul ;
Billah, Md. Morsaline ;
Sarker, Asim .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 778 (778)
[15]  
Djukic D., 2022, Yugosl. J. Oper. Res., V32, P389, DOI [10.2298/YJOR211125007D, DOI 10.2298/YJOR211125007D]
[16]  
Dukic A., 2021, EC CS INNOVATIVE EC, V9, P91, DOI [10.2478/eoik-2021-0023, DOI 10.2478/EOIK-2021-0023]
[17]   Assessment of health-care waste treatment alternatives using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches [J].
Dursun, Mehtap ;
Karsak, E. Ertugrul ;
Karadayi, Melis Almula .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 57 :98-107
[18]   Comparison of medical waste management methods in different countries: a systematic review [J].
Fadaei, Abdolmajid .
REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 38 (02) :339-348
[19]  
Ghram M., 2020, INT MULTICONFERENCE
[20]   Medical Waste Treatment Technologies for Energy, Fuels, and Materials Production: A Review [J].
Giakoumakis, Georgios ;
Politi, Dorothea ;
Sidiras, Dimitrios .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (23)