System modelling: Exploring engineering students perceptions and learning outcomes

被引:0
作者
Amida, Ademola [1 ]
Hung, Woei [2 ]
Algarni, Sameera [3 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Quentin Burdick Bldg,150C Dept 4510,POB 6050, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
[2] Univ North Dakota, Educ Bldg,Room 278,231 Centennial Dr Stop 7189, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
[3] Univ North Dakota, Educ Bldg.Room 200,231 Centennial Dr,Stop 7189, Grand Forks, ND 58201 USA
关键词
conceptual; engineering; learning outcomes; problem-solving; system-modeling; system-thinking; CAUSAL STRUCTURES;
D O I
10.1002/sres.2996
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study explored the students' perceptions and key learning outcomes with the use of system modelling (SM) instructional strategy. Specifically, the study sought to understand students' perceptions and experiences with the use of SM in enhancing their conceptual and application knowledge, as well as problem-solving and system thinking skills. The study employed a qualitative inquiry approach to gain insight into engineering students' experiences. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and students' artefacts, including problem-solving surveys and modelling diagrams. Overall, the findings indicated promising effects of the SM approach on students' learning outcomes. Seven major themes emerged from the interview data, including problem diagnosis, interconnection, linearity, external representation, wholeness, organized problem-solving approach and systematic process. The problem-solving inventory survey responses indicated that participants believed that the SM approach enhanced their problem-solving skills. Furthermore, the model diagram analysis suggested that all participants showed moderate gain in system thinking skills after the SM strategy. This paper presents these findings and the pedagogical implications for engineering education.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 613
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Ackoff R.L., 2000, Understanding business environments, P217
  • [2] Ackoff R. L., 2005, UNDERSTANDING BUSINE, P217
  • [3] Anderson L.W., 2001, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, CRIT ACCR ENG PROGR
  • [5] Bankel J, 2005, INT J ENG EDUC, V21, P121
  • [6] Bertalanffy L., 1950, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, V1, P134, DOI [10.1093/bjps/L2.134, 10.1093/bjps/I.2.134, DOI 10.1093/BJPS/I.2.134]
  • [7] University learning: Improve undergraduate science education
    Bradforth, Stephen E.
    Miller, Emily R.
    Dichtel, William R.
    Leibovich, Adam K.
    Feig, Andrew L.
    Martin, James D.
    Bjorkman, Karen S.
    Schultz, Zachary D.
    Smith, Tobin L.
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 523 (7560) : 282 - 284
  • [8] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [9] Buch A., 2015, International Perspectives on Engineering Education: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, V20, P495, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16169-3_24
  • [10] Concept-procedure interactions in children's addition and subtraction
    Canobi, Katherine H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 102 (02) : 131 - 149