Analysis of ethical considerations of COVID-19 vaccination: lessons for future

被引:1
作者
Malekzadeh, Roya [1 ]
Abedi, Ghasem [1 ]
Ziapour, Arash [2 ]
Yildirim, Murat [3 ,4 ]
Amirkhanlou, Afshin [5 ]
机构
[1] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Fac Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth, Sari, Iran
[2] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Imam Ali Hosp, Hlth Inst, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Kermanshah, Iran
[3] Agri Ibrahim Cecen Univ, Fac Sci & Letters, Dept Psychol, Agri, Turkiye
[4] Lebanese Amer Univ, Grad Studies & Res, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Sari, Iran
关键词
Vaccination; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Vaccine; Ethics; Public health emergency; PATIENT AUTONOMY; ACCEPTABILITY; TRUST;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-023-00969-y
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundSince the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, different countries sought to manufacture and supply effective vaccines to control the disease and prevent and protect public health in society. The implementation of vaccination has created many ethical dilemmas for humans, which must be recognized and resolved. Therefore, the present study was conducted to analyze the ethical considerations in vaccination against COVID-19 from the perspective of service providers.MethodsThe present qualitative research was conducted in 2022 in the north of Iran. The participants included 23 health workers with at least five years of work experience and members of the COVID-19 vaccination team. The data were initially collected through systematic semi-structured interviews, then snowball sampling and finally continued until data saturation. The next steps were transcription of interviews, identification of meaning units, coding, categorization based on similarity and symmetry, extraction of themes and the analysis of themes through content analysis.ResultsThe analysis of participants' experiences led to the extraction of five main categories of themes and fifteen sub-categories of the ethical considerations of COVID-19 vaccination. Safe and standard vaccine production, vaccine supply, fairness, respect for autonomy, and accountability were the main categories. The subcategories included compliance with scientific and ethical procedures, effectiveness and profitability of vaccine, absence of severe adverse effects, allocation of resources for vaccine supply, vaccine availability, diversity and comprehensiveness of alternative vaccines, vaccination prioritization, prioritization of the vulnerable populations of society, autonomy of patient (equal rights), autonomy of community, autonomy of service providers, reporting correct information, reporting vaccine side effects, public trust and acceptance.ConclusionThe health system managers should be adequately prepared to solve the ethical problems posed by COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, it is recommended to avoid haste in vaccination and pay more attention to vaccination safety standards, provide sufficient resources for a comprehensive vaccine supply, pay close attention to collective interests versus individual interests, and meet community needs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[2]  
Assessment S., 2009, Vaccines to children: Protective Effect and adverse events: a systematic review
[3]   The Vaccine Safety Datalink: A Model for Monitoring Immunization Safety [J].
Baggs, James ;
Gee, Julianne ;
Lewis, Edwin ;
Fowler, Gabrielle ;
Benson, Patti ;
Lieu, Tracy ;
Naleway, Allison ;
Klein, Nicola P. ;
Baxter, Roger ;
Belongia, Edward ;
Glanz, Jason ;
Hambidge, Simon J. ;
Jacobsen, Steven J. ;
Jackson, Lisa ;
Nordin, Jim ;
Weintraub, Eric .
PEDIATRICS, 2011, 127 :S45-S53
[4]   Parents' and guardians' views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: A multi-methods study in England [J].
Bell, Sadie ;
Clarke, Richard ;
Mounier-Jack, Sandra ;
Walker, Jemma L. ;
Paterson, Pauline .
VACCINE, 2020, 38 (49) :7789-7798
[5]   How to Measure Costs and Benefits of eHealth Interventions: An Overview of Methods and Frameworks [J].
Bergmo, Trine Strand .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (11)
[6]   Vaccine hesitancy: misinformation on social media [J].
Broadbent, Jack J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 366
[7]   Towards effective COVID-19 vaccines: Updates, perspectives and challenges (Review) [J].
Calina, Daniela ;
Docea, Anca Oana ;
Petrakis, Demetrios ;
Egorov, Alex M. ;
Ishmukhametov, Aydar A. ;
Gabibov, Alexsandr G. ;
Shtilman, Michael, I ;
Kostoff, Ronald ;
Carvalho, Felix ;
Vinceti, Marco ;
Spandidos, Demetrios A. ;
Tsatsakis, Aristidis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (01) :3-16
[8]   Voluntary vaccination: the pandemic effect [J].
Cave, Emma .
LEGAL STUDIES, 2017, 37 (02) :279-304
[9]   Preparing patients and caregivers to participate in care delivered across settings: The care transitions intervention [J].
Coleman, EA ;
Smith, JD ;
Frank, JC ;
Min, SJ ;
Parry, C ;
Kramer, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (11) :1817-1825
[10]   Protecting public trust in immunization [J].
Cooper, Louis Z. ;
Larson, Heidi J. ;
Katz, Samuel L. .
PEDIATRICS, 2008, 122 (01) :149-153