Comparative assessment of future solar power potential based on CMIP5 and CMIP6 multi-model ensembles

被引:24
作者
Ha, Subin [1 ]
Zhou, Zixuan [2 ]
Im, Eun-Soon [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lee, Young-Mi [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Environm & Sustainabil, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] ECO Brain Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Kowloon, Acad Bldg 3594,Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Solar power potential; Multi-model projections; Coupled model intercomparison project phase 5; Climate change mitigation; Coupled model intercomparison project phase 6; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; RADIATION; MODELS; TECHNOLOGIES; EFFICIENCY; PROSPECT; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While the popularity and feasibility of solar power have increased toward achieving a low-carbon and climate-resilient society, it is uncertain how changes in climate attributes will affect the future potential of solar power output. This study presents a comparative assessment of future changes in solar power in terms of the technology for harnessing energy from insolation (PVP vs CSP), climate projections (CMIP5 vs CMIP6), and emission sce-narios. Both CMIP5 and CMIP6 multi-model projections capture the major characteristics of the global distri-bution seen in PVP and CSP calculated using the reanalysis data during the historical period. However, despite the general similarity to CMIP5-based results, CMIP6 models slightly outperform their CMIP5 counterparts regarding quantitative metrics and enhance the robustness of the future change signal estimated by the statistical significance and inter-model consistency. The future changes in PVP and CSP patterns are sensitive to the emission scenarios that can control the degree of warming. Under the fossil-fueled development scenarios, the greater increase in temperatures may lead to a high vulnerability of the solar power supply by reducing the output of both PVP and CSP. This study is timely and relevant to emphasizing the benefits of climate change mitigation, which can support the sustainable development of solar energy.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 335
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, BP statistical review of world energy
[2]   Historical development of concentrating solar power technologies to generate clean electricity efficiently - A review [J].
Baharoon, Dhyia Aidroos ;
Rahman, Hasimah Abdul ;
Omar, Wan Zaidi Wan ;
Fadhl, Saeed Obaid .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 :996-1027
[3]   Forecasted Changes in West Africa Photovoltaic Energy Output by 2045 [J].
Bazyomo, Serge Dimitri Yikwe Buri ;
Lawin, Emmanuel Agnide ;
Coulibaly, Ousmane ;
Ouedraogo, Abdoulaye .
CLIMATE, 2016, 4 (04)
[4]   Potential impact of climate change on solar resource in Africa for photovoltaic energy: analyses from CORDEX-AFRICA climate experiments [J].
Bichet, Adeline ;
Hingray, Benoit ;
Evin, Guillaume ;
Diedhiou, Arona ;
Kebe, Cheikh Mouhamed Fadel ;
Anquetin, Sandrine .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (12)
[5]   The future prospect of PV and CSP solar technologies: An expert elicitation survey [J].
Bosetti, Valentina ;
Catenacci, Michela ;
Fiorese, Giulia ;
Verdolini, Elena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 49 :308-317
[6]   Comparisons Between CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models: Simulations of Climate Indices Influencing Food Security, Infrastructure Resilience, and Human Health in Canada [J].
Bourdeau-Goulet, Sarah-Claude ;
Hassanzadeh, Elmira .
EARTHS FUTURE, 2021, 9 (05)
[7]   Performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in a water pumping system in Brazil [J].
Camargo Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo ;
Bedin, Janaina ;
Niedzialkoski, Rosana Krauss ;
Melegari de Souza, Samuel Nelson ;
Munhoz das Neves, Joao Carlos .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 51 :1610-1616
[8]   Installation and operation of parabolic trough organic Rankine cycle solar thermal power plant in south Louisiana [J].
Chambers, T. ;
Raush, J. ;
Russo, B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOLARPACES 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2014, 49 :1107-1116
[9]   Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes [J].
Chen, Huopo ;
Sun, Jianqi ;
Lin, Wenqing ;
Xu, Huiwen .
SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) :1415-1418
[10]   A detailed modeling method for photovoltaic cells [J].
Chenni, R. ;
Makhlouf, M. ;
Kerbache, T. ;
Bouzid, A. .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (09) :1724-1730