Accuracy of pattern deviation in estimating the glaucomatous damage in the central 10° visual field in eyes with glaucoma and cataract

被引:2
作者
Tomita, Ryo [1 ]
Asaoka, Ryo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hirasawa, Kazunori [5 ]
Fujino, Yuri [2 ,6 ]
Nakakura, Shunsuke [7 ]
Murata, Hiroshi [8 ]
Omura, Tetsuo [6 ]
Shoji, Nobuyuki [9 ]
Obana, Akira [2 ,10 ]
Nishiguchi, Koji M. [1 ]
Tanito, Masaki [6 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Ophthalmol, Grad Sch Med, Fac Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Seirei Hamamatsu Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 4308558, Japan
[3] Seirei Christopher Univ, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Grad Sch Creat New Photon Ind, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
[5] Kitasato Univ, Ophthalmol, Sch Med, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
[6] Shimane Univ, Fac Med, Grad Sch Med, Ophthalmol, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
[7] Tsukazaki Hosp, Ophthalmol, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
[8] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Ophthalmol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Kitasato Univ, Ophthalmol, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[10] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Dept Med Spect, Preemenent Med Photon Educ & Res Ctr, Inst Med Photon Res, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
关键词
Glaucoma; Field of vision; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; PARAFOVEAL SCOTOMA; FULL THRESHOLD; SITA STANDARD; EXTRACTION; PROGRESSION; PERIMETRY; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1136/bjo-2022-322274
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background/aims The accuracy of pattern deviation (PD) in estimating the damage to the glaucomatous visual field (VF) in the central 10 degrees in eyes with glaucoma and cataract is unclear. Methods This retrospective study includes 63 eyes of 52 glaucoma patients who successfully underwent cataract surgery or cataract surgery plus iStent implantation. Using the Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 test, VF was measured within 6 months preoperatively and postoperatively (VFpre and VFpost, respectively). The mean total deviation values in VFpost (mTD(post)) indicates glaucomatous damage without cataract and the difference between this value and mean PD values in VFpre (mPD(pre)) was evaluated (epsilon mPD). The effect of cataract was then evaluated as the difference between mTD(post) and mTD(pre) (Delta mTD), while the effects of mTD(post) and Delta mTD on epsilon mPD were also assessed. In addition, based on preoperative visual acuity (VA(pre)) and VFpre, the optimal model for predicting mTD(post) was identified. The error of this method (epsilon OptimalModel) was estimated as the difference against mTD(post), which was compared with epsilon mPD. Results Compared with mTD(pre), there was a significant improvement in mTD(post) (p=0.028). A significant difference was observed between mPD(pre) and mTD(post) (p<0.001). Further, epsilon mPD significantly increased with the increase of mTD(post) or Delta mTD (p<0.001 and p=0.0444, respectively). The absolute epsilon OptimalModel was significantly smaller than the absolute epsilon mPD (p<0.001). Conclusions This study warns clinicians that PD of the central 10 degrees VF might underestimate the glaucomatous VF damage with the progression of glaucoma and overestimate it as a cataract progresses.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Altangerel Undraa, 2003, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V14, P100, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200304000-00009
  • [2] Anderson DR, 1999, Automated Static Perimetry, V2nd, P121
  • [3] Visual field progression in glaucoma: Total versus pattern deviation analyses
    Artes, PH
    Nicolela, MT
    LeBlanc, RP
    Chauhan, BC
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46 (12) : 4600 - 4606
  • [4] Artes PH, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P2654
  • [6] Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
    Baayen, R. H.
    Davidson, D. J.
    Bates, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 390 - 412
  • [7] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [8] Bengtsson B, 1997, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V75, P184
  • [9] Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA standard, SITA fast, and the Humphrey full threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC
    Bengtsson, B
    Heijl, A
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 77 (02): : 125 - 129
  • [10] Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection
    Burnham, KP
    Anderson, DR
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) : 261 - 304