Research on low-carbon evaluation of green buildings based on the whole life cycle theory

被引:4
作者
Jamaludin, Farah Adilah Binti [1 ]
Li, Jiabo [1 ]
机构
[1] UCSI Univ, Fac Engn Technol & Built Environm, Kuala Lumpur 56000, CO, Malaysia
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2023年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
Whole life cycle theory; Green buildings; Low-carbon evaluation; Grey relational analysis; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-023-05488-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cities are highly dense areas with significant energy consumption and waste generation. Therefore, developing buildings with low energy consumption and reduced pollutant emissions is an important approach for China to achieve its goals of carbon neutrality, peak carbon emissions, and sustainable development. In this context, the concept and practice of green buildings have emerged. This research is based on the whole life cycle assessment method of the whole life cycle theory, integrating relevant indicators for calculating carbon emissions in buildings. It conducts a multidimensional evaluation and analysis of the low-carbon level of green buildings. Quantitative analysis is carried out based on five stages and five dimensions of the entire construction process. A conceptual model for the low-carbon evaluation of green buildings is established, and grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process are employed to rank and evaluate projects. The study aims to identify the key factors in the low-carbon evaluation of green buildings and discusses the focus and suggestions for future low-carbon management throughout the whole life cycle of green buildings. Based on LCA theory and carbon-emission index to evaluation the green buildings.Quantitative analysis on the green buildings based on the five stages and dimensions.Four green building cases are evaluated and ranked by Ahp and grey correlation method.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Chenyuancao, 2022, Comparative analysis of German dgnb and Chinese green building evaluation standards
[2]  
Chuanjie C, 2022, North Sericult, V43, P9, DOI [10.19443/j.cnki.1673-9922.2022.04.002, DOI 10.19443/J.CNKI.1673-9922.2022.04.002]
[3]  
Chunlin Z, 2023, J Landsc Res, V15, P6, DOI [10.16785/j.issn1943-989x.2023.1.002, DOI 10.16785/J.ISSN1943-989X.2023.1.002]
[4]  
Congxiao L, 2021, Constr Enterp Manag, V400, P26, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1001-9251.2021.12.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1001-9251.2021.12.004]
[5]   Green buildings life cycle cost analysis and life cycle budget development: Practical applications [J].
Dwaikat, Luay N. ;
Ali, Kherun N. .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 18 :303-311
[6]  
Enyoghasi C, 2020, Int J Sustain Manuf, V4, P165, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJSM.2020.107138
[7]  
Gheewala Shabbir H., 2020, E3S Web of Conferences, V202, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202020201003
[8]  
Gong Zhiqi, 2004, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V44, P1209
[9]   An analytical approach on life cycle cost analysis of a green building [J].
Gopanagoni, Varshini ;
Velpula, Sree Lakshmi .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 33 :387-390
[10]  
Guo AM, 2006, Southwest China J Agric Sci., DOI [10.1109/WiCOM.2006.186, DOI 10.1109/WICOM.2006.186]