Comparison of a Novel, Flavor-optimized, Polyethylene Glycol and Sulfate Bowel Preparation With Oral Sulfate Solution in Adults Undergoing Colonoscopy

被引:3
作者
Bhandari, Raj [1 ]
Goldstein, Michael [2 ]
Mishkin, Daniel S. [3 ]
McGowan, John [4 ]
Cleveland, Mark vB. [4 ]
Di Palma, Jack A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Delta Res Partners, Monroe, LA USA
[2] Long Isl GI Res Grp, Great Neck, NY USA
[3] GI Reviewers, Brookline, MA USA
[4] Braintree Labs Inc, Braintree, MA USA
[5] Univ S Alabama, Coll Med, Div Gastroenterol, Mobile, AL USA
[6] Univ S Alabama, Div Gastroenterol, 75 Univ Blvd, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
关键词
bowel preparation; colonoscopy; colon cleansing; SAFETY; VOLUME; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001894
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: A new bowel preparation for colonoscopy has been developed containing poorly absorbed sulfate salts and polyethylene glycol 3350, which retain water within the intestinal lumen resulting in copious diarrhea, thereby cleansing the bowel. The product was formulated to be safe and effective with a sports drink-like flavor. This study evaluated the new flavored polyethylene glycol and sulfate solution (FPSS) compared with a Food and Drug Administration-approved bowel preparation containing sulfate salts only [oral sulfate solution (OSS)].Methods: Five hundred adults were enrolled in this multicenter, noninferiority study. Subjects were assigned FPSS or OSS administered in split-dose regimens (PM/AM). FPSS subjects took 2 L of the flavored osmotic solution (1 L at night and 1 L in the morning). OSS was taken according to its approved labeling. Colonoscopies were graded globally and segmentally by blinded local investigators using a 4-point scale (excellent, good, fair, and poor), with "good" and "excellent" considered successful. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory testing.Results: A high rate of cleansing success was seen with FPSS (94%), which was noninferior to OSS (94%). This conclusion was confirmed by blinded central readers. Segmental success rates were > 90% for both preparations, including the right colon. Questionnaire ratings indicated the FPSS experience was preferred over OSS with 87% of FPSS subjects noting their preparation was "tolerable" to "very easy" to consume versus 74% for OSS. The majority of FPSS subjects agreed their preparation tasted like a sports drink. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common AEs. There was no difference between preparations for any AE and no clinically significant differences in laboratory parameters.Conclusions: The new sports drink-like flavored preparation achieved a high level of cleansing in the study, demonstrating non inferiority to OSS. FPSS was well-tolerated with low rates of expected gastrointestinal symptoms. The optimized flavor of FPSS resulted in significantly better acceptance ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 927
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
  • [2] Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate
    DeMicco, Michael P.
    Clayton, Lucy B.
    Pilot, Jeff
    Epstein, Michael S.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (03) : 677 - +
  • [3] A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy
    di Palma, Jack A.
    Bhandari, Raj
    Cleveland, Mark V. B.
    Mishkin, Daniel S.
    Tesoriero, Jessica
    Hall, Sue
    McGowan, John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 (02) : 319 - 328
  • [4] A Randomized Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a New, Reduced-Volume, Oral Sulfate Colon-Cleansing Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Di Palma, Jack A.
    Rodriguez, Reynaldo
    McGowan, John
    Cleveland, Mark vB.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (09) : 2275 - 2284
  • [5] A LOW-SODIUM SOLUTION FOR GASTROINTESTINAL LAVAGE
    FORDTRAN, JS
    ANA, CAS
    CLEVELAND, MV
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 98 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [6] Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial
    Gu, Phillip
    Lew, Daniel
    Oh, Sun Jung
    Vipani, Aarshi
    Ko, Jeffrey
    Hsu, Kevin
    Mirakhor, Ebrahim
    Pattisapu, Varun
    Bullen, Tia
    Fuller, Garth
    Spiegel, Brennan M. R.
    Almario, Christopher V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 (02) : 305 - 314
  • [7] Severe Hyponatremia and Miralax-Gatorade Bowel Preparation
    Lewis, Jason
    Schoenfeld, Philip
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S582 - S583
  • [8] Randomised clinical trial: polyethylene glycol 3350 with sports drink vs. polyethylene glycol with electrolyte solution as purgatives for colonoscopy - the incidence of hyponatraemia
    Matro, R.
    Daskalakis, C.
    Negoianu, D.
    Katz, L.
    Henry, C.
    Share, M.
    Kastenberg, D.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 40 (06) : 610 - 619
  • [9] Intestinal and Renal Effects of Low-Volume Phosphate and Sulfate Cathartic Solutions Designed for Cleansing the Colon: Pathophysiological Studies in Five Normal Subjects
    Patel, Viralkumar
    Nicar, Michael
    Emmett, Michael
    Asplin, John
    Maguire, John A.
    Ana, Carol A. Santa
    Fordtran, John S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (04) : 953 - 965
  • [10] SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT ASSIGNMENT WITH BALANCING FOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
    POCOCK, SJ
    SIMON, R
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1975, 31 (01) : 103 - 115