Correlation between prehospital and in-hospital hypotension and outcomes after traumatic brain injury

被引:9
作者
Rice, Amber D. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Hu, Chengcheng [1 ,3 ]
Spaite, Daniel W. [1 ,2 ]
Barnhart, Bruce J. [1 ]
Chikani, Vatsal [4 ]
Gaither, Joshua B. [1 ,2 ]
Denninghoff, Kurt R. [1 ,2 ]
Bradley, Gail H. [4 ]
Howard, Jeffrey T. [5 ]
Keim, Samuel M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bobrow, Bentley J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med Phoenix, Arizona Emergency Med Res Ctr, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Bur EMS, Arizona Dept Hlth Serv, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Publ Hlth, San Antonio, TX USA
[6] UT Hlth, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Houston, TX USA
[7] Dept Emergency Med, 1501 N Campbell Ave, AHSL 4173E, POB 245057, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Prehospital; Hypotension; Blood pressure; SEVERE HEAD-INJURY; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MANAGEMENT; HYPOXIA; GUIDELINES; INSULTS; IMPACT; COMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.015
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Hypotension has a powerful effect on patient outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The relative impact of hypotension occurring in the field versus during early hospital resuscitation is unknown. We evaluated the association between hypotension and mortality and non-mortality outcomes in four cohorts defined by where the hypotension occurred [neither prehospital nor hospital, prehospital only, hospital only, both prehospital and hospital].Methods: Subjects >= 10 years with major TBI were included. Standard statistics were used for unadjusted analyses. We used logistic regression, controlling for significant confounders, to determine the adjusted odds (aOR) for outcomes in each of the three cohorts. Results: Included were 12,582 subjects (69.8% male; median age 44 (IQR 26-61). Mortality by hypotension sta-tus: No hypotension: 9.2% (95%CI: 8.7-9.8%); EMS hypotension only: 27.8% (24.6-31.2%); hospital hypotension only: 45.6% (39.1-52.1%); combined EMS/hospital hypotension 57.6% (50.0-65.0%); (p < 0.0001). The aOR for death reflected the same progression: 1.0 (reference-no hypotension), 1.8 (1.39-2.33), 2.61 (1.73-3.94), and 4.36 (2.78-6.84), respectively. The proportion of subjects having hospital hypotension was 19.0% (16.5-21.7%) in those with EMS hypotension compared to 2.0% (1.8-2.3%) for those without (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the proportion of patients with TC hypotension was increased even with EMS "near hypotension" up to an SBP of 120 mmHg [(aOR 3.78 (2.97, 4.82)].Conclusion: While patients with hypotension in the field or on arrival at the trauma center had markedly in-creased risk of death compared to those with no hypotension, those with prehospital hypotension that was not resolved before hospital arrival had, by far, the highest odds of death. Furthermore, TBI patients who had pre -hospital hypotension were five times more likely to arrive hypotensive at the trauma center than those who did not. Finally, even "near-hypotension" in the field was strongly and independently associated the risk of a hypo-tensive hospital arrival (<90 mmHg). These findings are supportive of the prehospital guidelines that recom-mend aggressive prevention and treatment of hypotension in major TBI.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 103
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, Traumatic brain injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation
  • [2] Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury
    Badjatia, Neeraj
    Carney, Nancy
    Crocco, Todd J.
    Fallat, Mary Elizabeth
    Hennes, Halim M. A.
    Jagoda, Andrew S.
    Jernigan, Sarah
    Letarte, Peter B.
    Lerner, E. Brooke
    Moriarty, Thomas M.
    Pons, Peter T.
    Sasser, Scott
    Scalea, Thomas
    Schleien, Charles L.
    Wright, David W.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2008, 12 : S1 - S52
  • [3] A novel method of evaluating the impact of secondary brain insults on functional outcomes in traumatic brain-injured patients
    Barton, CW
    Hemphill, JC
    Morabito, D
    Manley, G
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [4] Redefining hypotension in traumatic brain injury
    Berry, Cherisse
    Ley, Eric J.
    Bukur, Marko
    Malinoski, Darren
    Margulies, Daniel R.
    Mirocha, James
    Salim, Ali
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (11): : 1833 - 1837
  • [5] Traditional systolic blood pressure targets underestimate hypotension-induced secondary brain injury
    Brenner, Megan
    Stein, Deborah M.
    Hu, Peter F.
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Sheth, Kevin
    Scalea, Thomas M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 72 (05) : 1135 - 1139
  • [6] Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Editor's commentary
    Bullock, M. Ross
    Povlishock, John T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2007, 24 : VII - VIII
  • [7] Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition
    Carney, Nancy
    Totten, Annette M.
    O'Reilly, Cindy
    Ullman, Jamie S.
    Hawryluk, Gregory W. J.
    Bell, Michael J.
    Bratton, Susan L.
    Chesnut, Randall
    Harris, Odette A.
    Kissoon, Niranjan
    Rubiano, Andres M.
    Shutter, Lori
    Tasker, Robert C.
    Vavilala, Monica S.
    Wilberger, Jack
    Wright, David W.
    Ghajar, Jamshid
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [8] AEROMEDICAL PREHOSPITAL NEUROTRAUMA CARE AND SECONDARY SYSTEMIC INSULTS TO THE INJURED BRAIN
    CARREL, M
    MOESCHLER, O
    RAVUSSIN, P
    FAVRE, JB
    BOULARD, G
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1994, 13 (03): : 326 - 335
  • [9] CDC, BAR MATR CDC
  • [10] THE ROLE OF SECONDARY BRAIN INJURY IN DETERMINING OUTCOME FROM SEVERE HEAD-INJURY
    CHESNUT, RM
    MARSHALL, LF
    KLAUBER, MR
    BLUNT, BA
    BALDWIN, N
    EISENBERG, HM
    JANE, JA
    MARMAROU, A
    FOULKES, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1993, 34 (02) : 216 - 222