Comparison of disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter isolates of meat origin

被引:12
作者
Lazou, Thomai P. [1 ]
Chaintoutis, Serafeim C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Vet Med, Lab Anim Food Prod Hyg Vet Publ Hlth, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Vet Med, Diagnost Lab, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Campylobacter; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Broth microdilution; Disk diffusion; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; SPP;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2022.106649
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the disk diffusion (DD) and the broth microdilution (BMD) methods in determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of 36 Campylobacter isolates of meat-origin to six antibacterial drugs (erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, streptomycin, gentamicin and nalidixic acid). All the available zone diameter and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of C. jejuni and C. coli as recommended by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) were utilized. In addition, the zone diameter breakpoints of Enterobacterales for nalidixic acid, gentamicin, and streptomycin, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), were applied. All Campylobacter isolates were categorised as susceptible to erythromycin and gentamicin by both methods indicating completely concordant classification results. The overall highest 'Very major error' (VME) and 'Major error' (ME) rates were detected for nalidixic acid (13.3%) and tetracycline (26.3%), respectively, whereas a 'Minor error' (mE) rate was detected only for ciprofloxacin (60.1%). However, the Cohen's kappa statistic indicated a substantial concordance between the DD and BMD classification results for tetracycline and streptomycin, and almost perfect agreement for nalidixic acid, with corresponding categorical agreement rates of over 86% and approximately up to 92%. The correlation between the complementary inhibition zones and MIC breakpoints was strong and statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) for ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, streptomycin, and nalidixic acid.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Technical specifications on harmonised monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from food-producing animals and food [J].
Aerts, Marc ;
Battisti, Antonio ;
Hendriksen, Rene ;
Kempf, Isabelle ;
Teale, Christopher ;
Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois ;
Veldman, Kees ;
Wasyl, Dariusz ;
Guerra, Beatriz ;
Liebana, Ernesto ;
Thomas-Lopez, Daniel ;
Beloeil, Pierre-Alexandre .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (06)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WHO global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance
[3]   Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: comparison between Etest and a broth dilution method [J].
Azrad, Maya ;
Tkhawkho, Linda ;
Isakovich, Natalia ;
Nitzan, Orna ;
Peretz, Avi .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND ANTIMICROBIALS, 2018, 17
[4]   Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in bacteria of animal origin: epidemiological and microbiological methodologies [J].
Caprioli, A ;
Busani, L ;
Martel, JL ;
Helmuth, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2000, 14 (04) :295-301
[5]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2022, M100-Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing
[6]  
CLSI, 2015, VER COMM MICR ID ANT, V1st
[7]   New and alternative strategies for the prevention, control, and treatment of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter [J].
Dai, Lei ;
Sahin, Orhan ;
Grover, Madhusudan ;
Zhang, Qijing .
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 223 :76-88
[8]  
Dohoo I., 2010, VET EPIDEMIOLOGIC RE, P91
[9]  
European Food Safety Authority, 2021, EFSA J, V19, DOI [10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6971, 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6406]
[10]   The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019 [J].
European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2021, 19 (04)