A coupled model to improve river water quality prediction towards addressing non-stationarity and data limitation

被引:38
作者
Chen, Shengyue [1 ]
Huang, Jinliang [1 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Tang, Xi [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Fujian Key Lab Coastal Pollut Prevent & Control, Xiamen 361102, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Nat Resource Conservat, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources Management, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
River water quality; Deep learning; Wavelet analysis; Transfer learning; Non-stationarity; Data limitation; NEURAL-NETWORK; WAVELET; DYNAMICS; DRIVEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2023.120895
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate predictions of river water quality are vital for sustainable water management. However, even the powerful deep learning model, i.e., long short-term memory (LSTM), has difficulty in accurately predicting water quality dynamics owing to the high non-stationarity and data limitation in a changing environment. To wiggle out of quagmires, wavelet analysis (WA) and transfer learning (TL) techniques were introduced in this study to assist LSTM modeling, termed WA-LSTM-TL. Total phosphorus, total nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, and permanganate index were predicted in a 4 h step within 49 water quality monitoring sites in a coastal province of China. We selected suitable source domains for each target domain using an innovatively proposed regionalization approach that included 20 attributes to improve the prediction efficiency of WA-LSTM-TL. The coupled WA-LSTM facilitated capturing non-stationary patterns of water quality dynamics and improved the performance by 53 % during testing phase compared to conventional LSTM. The WA-LSTM-TL, aided by the knowledge of source domain, obtained a 17 % higher performance compared to locally trained WA-LSTM, and such improvement was more impressive when local data was limited (+66 %). The benefit of TL-based modeling diminished as data quantity increased; however, it outperformed locally direct modeling regardless of whether target domain data was limited or sufficient. This study demonstrates the reasoning for coupling WA and TL techniques with LSTM models and provides a newly coupled modeling approach for improving short-term prediction of river water quality from the perspectives of non-stationarity and data limitation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 76 条
[41]  
NASA JPL, 2020, Databasin 30 Arc-Second DEM of Asia, DOI [DOI 10.5067/MEASURES/NASADEM/NASADEM_HGT.001, 10.5067/MEASURES/NASADEM/NASADEM_HGT.001, https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/NASADEM/NASADEMHGT.001, 10.5067/MEaSUREs/NASADEM/NASADEMHGT.001]
[42]  
Nash J.E., 1970, J Hydrol, V10, P282, DOI [10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
[43]   Addressing data challenges in riverine nutrient load modeling of an intensively managed agro-industrial watershed [J].
Niroula, Sundar ;
Wallington, Kevin ;
Cai, Ximing .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2023, 59 (02) :213-225
[44]   Applications of hybrid wavelet-Artificial Intelligence models in hydrology: A review [J].
Nourani, Vahid ;
Baghanam, Aida Hosseini ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Kisi, Ozgur .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 514 :358-377
[45]   The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2, version 2016 (ODIAC2016): a global monthly fossil fuel CO2 gridded emissions data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions [J].
Oda, Tomohiro ;
Maksyutov, Shamil ;
Andres, Robert J. .
EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2018, 10 (01) :87-107
[46]   A Survey on Transfer Learning [J].
Pan, Sinno Jialin ;
Yang, Qiang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2010, 22 (10) :1345-1359
[47]   TLT: Recurrent fine-tuning transfer learning for water quality long-term prediction [J].
Peng, Lin ;
Wu, Huan ;
Gao, Min ;
Yi, Hualing ;
Xiong, Qingyu ;
Yang, Linda ;
Cheng, Shuiping .
WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 225
[48]   Regionalization for Ungauged Catchments - Lessons Learned From a Comparative Large-Sample Study [J].
Pool, Sandra ;
Vis, Marc ;
Seibert, Jan .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 57 (10)
[49]   Performance Comparison of an LSTM-based Deep Learning Model versus Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Streamflow Forecasting [J].
Rahimzad, Maryam ;
Moghaddam Nia, Alireza ;
Zolfonoon, Hosam ;
Soltani, Jaber ;
Danandeh Mehr, Ali ;
Kwon, Hyun-Han .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (12) :4167-4187
[50]   Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science [J].
Reichstein, Markus ;
Camps-Valls, Gustau ;
Stevens, Bjorn ;
Jung, Martin ;
Denzler, Joachim ;
Carvalhais, Nuno ;
Prabhat .
NATURE, 2019, 566 (7743) :195-204