Risk assessment of critical infrastructures: A methodology based on criticality of infrastructure elements

被引:16
作者
Saruniene, Inga [1 ,2 ]
Martisauskas, Linas [1 ,2 ]
Krikstolaitis, Ricardas [1 ,2 ]
Augutis, Juozas [2 ]
Setola, Roberto [3 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Energy Inst, Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Univ Campus Biomed, Rome, Italy
关键词
Critical infrastructure; Risk assessment; Criticality; Bayesian networks; Interdependencies; Multi-hazard; BAYESIAN NETWORK; RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109797
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The assessment of risk for critical infrastructures (CIs) is a crucial aspect in ensuring the security of every country. It is imperative to have an appropriate methodology that can effectively provide adequate measures to prevent or mitigate potential impacts of hazards that may disrupt the operation of CIs. This paper presents a methodology for the risk assessment of critical infrastructure that addresses three key aspects: (a) suitability for cross-sector systems, (b) capturing dependencies and interdependencies amongst CIs, and (c) ensuring a multi -hazard approach. The proposed methodology focuses on the criticality assessment of CI elements resulting from the loss of their functionality, and the evaluation of the probability of functionality loss for these elements. By combining these assessments, the final results, which portray the risk picture, are presented through a risk matrix in a simple and explicit manner. This approach facilitates better communication with stakeholders by providing a simple and explicit depiction of the risk levels associated with CIs. To illustrate the practical implementation of the proposed methodology, a case study is presented in this paper. The results obtained from the application of the methodology highlight the most critical elements within CIs, which pose the highest level of risk.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, GeNIe Modeler Programmer's Manual
[2]   Critical infrastructure, geographical information science and risk governance: A systematic cross-field review [J].
Arvidsson, Bjorn ;
Johansson, Jonas ;
Guldaker, Nicklas .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 213
[3]   The assessment technology of energy critical infrastructure [J].
Augutis, Juozas ;
Joksas, Benas ;
Krikstolaitis, Ricardas ;
Urbonas, Rolandas .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 162 :1494-1504
[4]   CRITICALITY ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE [J].
Augutis, Juozas ;
Joksas, Benas ;
Krikstolaitis, Ricardas ;
Zutautaite, Inga .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2014, 20 (02) :312-331
[5]   Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment [J].
Barua, Shubharthi ;
Gao, Xiaodan ;
Pasman, Hans ;
Mannan, M. Sam .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 41 :399-410
[6]   Preliminary interdependency analysis: An approach to support critical-infrastructure risk-assessment [J].
Bloomfield, Robin E. ;
Popov, Peter ;
Salako, Kizito ;
Stankovic, Vladimir ;
Wright, David .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 167 :198-217
[7]   Scenario analysis using Bayesian networks: A case study in energy sector [J].
Cinar, Didem ;
Kayakutlu, Gulgun .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2010, 23 (03) :267-276
[8]   A dynamic Bayesian network based framework to evaluate cascading effects in a power grid [J].
Codetta-Raiteri, Daniele ;
Bobbio, Andrea ;
Montani, Stefania ;
Portinale, Luigi .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 25 (04) :683-697
[9]  
Complex Systems Society, 2022, What are complex systems?
[10]   Using interconnected risk maps to assess the threats faced by electricity infrastructures [J].
Correa-Henao, Gabriel J. ;
Yusta, Jose M. ;
Lacal-Arantegui, Roberto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, 2013, 6 (3-4) :197-216