Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury*

被引:13
|
作者
Goss, Adeline L. [1 ]
Voumard, Rachel Rutz [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Engelberg, Ruth A. [5 ,6 ]
Curtis, J. Randall [5 ,6 ]
Creutzfeldt, Claire J. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Highland Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Neurol, Oakland, CA 94602 USA
[2] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Palliat & Support Care Serv, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Inst Humanities Med, Clin Eth Unit, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Cambia Palliat Care Ctr Excellence, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
acute brain injuries; clinical decision-making; communication; neurology; prognosis; PALLIATIVE CARE; LIFE-SUPPORT; PROGNOSIS; SATURATION; AID;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000005850
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives:In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experiences and needs during the period of active decision-making in SABI, to inform interventions to support SABI patients and families and improve clinician-surrogate communication. Design:We interviewed surrogate decision-makers during patients' acute hospitalization for SABI, as part of a larger (n = 222) prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with SABI and their family members. Constructivist grounded theory informed data collection and analysis. Setting:One U.S. academic medical center. Patients:We iteratively collected and analyzed semistructured interviews with 22 surrogates for 19 patients. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:Through several rounds of coding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describing the relationship between surrogate perspectives on decision-making and surrogate experiences of prognostic uncertainty. Patients ranged from 20 to 79 years of age (mean = 55 years) and had primary diagnoses of stroke (n = 13; 68%), traumatic brain injury (n = 5; 26%), and anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest (n = 1; 5%). Patients were predominantly male (n = 12; 63%), whereas surrogates were predominantly female (n = 13; 68%). Two distinct perspectives on decision-making emerged: one group of surrogates felt a clear sense of agency around decision-making, whereas the other group reported a more passive role in decision-making, such that they did not even perceive there being a decision to make. Surrogates in both groups identified prognostic uncertainty as the central challenge in SABI, but they managed it differently. Only surrogates who felt they were actively deciding described time-limited trials as helpful. Conclusions:In this qualitative study, not all surrogate "decision-makers" viewed themselves as making decisions. Nearly all struggled with prognostic uncertainty. Our findings underline the need for longitudinal prognostic communication strategies in SABI targeted at surrogates' current perspectives on decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 935
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making regarding treatment limitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A survey of French neurosurgeons
    Boyer, F.
    Audibert, G.
    Baumann, C.
    Colnat-Coulbois, S.
    Pinelli, C.
    Claudot, F.
    Baumann, A.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2018, 64 (06) : 401 - 409
  • [2] Life-and-death decision-making in the acute phase after a severe stroke: Interviews with relatives
    de Boer, Marike E.
    Depla, Marja
    Wojtkowiak, Joanna
    Visser, Marieke C.
    Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
    Francke, Anneke L.
    Hertogh, Cees M. P. M.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (05) : 451 - 457
  • [3] The patient with severe traumatic brain injury: clinical decision-making: the first 60 min and beyond
    van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    Lavrijsen, Jan C. M.
    Ribbers, Gerard M.
    Kompanje, Erwin J. O.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 25 (06) : 622 - 629
  • [4] Concerns of surrogate decision makers for patients with acute brain injury: A US population survey
    Hwang, David Y.
    Knies, Andrea K.
    Mampre, David
    Kolenikov, Stanislav
    Schalk, Marci
    Hammer, Heather
    White, Douglas B.
    Holloway, Robert G.
    Sheth, Kevin N.
    Fraenkel, Liana
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (19) : E2054 - E2068
  • [5] Taking a Chance to Recover: Families Look Back on the Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy After Severe Acute Brain Injury
    Lou, William
    Granstein, Justin H.
    Wabl, Rafael
    Singh, Amita
    Wahlster, Sarah
    Creutzfeldt, Claire J.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2022, 36 (02) : 504 - 510
  • [6] Taking a Chance to Recover: Families Look Back on the Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy After Severe Acute Brain Injury
    William Lou
    Justin H. Granstein
    Rafael Wabl
    Amita Singh
    Sarah Wahlster
    Claire J. Creutzfeldt
    Neurocritical Care, 2022, 36 : 504 - 510
  • [7] The surrogate: Partner in the shared decision-making
    Sarradon-Eck, Aline
    Capodano, Geraldine
    Bureau, Eve
    Julian-Reynier, Claire
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2016, 103 (7-8) : 632 - 642
  • [8] Surrogate Decision-Making After Stroke in a Community Setting: The OASIS Project
    Zahuranec, Darin B.
    Ortiz, Carmen
    Lank, Rebecca J.
    Zhang, Guanghao
    Shi, Xu
    Case, Erin
    Morgenstern, Lewis B.
    STROKE, 2024, 55 (03) : 678 - 686
  • [9] Goals of Care for Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients: When a Choice Is Not a Choice*
    Jaffa, Matthew N.
    Hwang, David Y.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (07) : 978 - 980
  • [10] Choice of dialysis modality: patients' experiences and quality of decision after shared decision-making
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Lomborg, Kirsten
    Jensen, Jens Dam
    Stacey, Dawn
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 21 (01)