Self-efficacy in gifted and non-gifted students: A multilevel meta-analysis

被引:11
作者
Alabbasi, Ahmed M. Abdulla [1 ,5 ]
Sultan, Zainab M. [2 ]
Karwowski, Maciej [3 ]
Cross, Tracy L. [4 ]
Ayoub, Alaa Eldin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arabian Gulf Univ, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Minist Educ, Isa Town, Bahrain
[3] Univ Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
[4] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA USA
[5] Arabian Gulf Univ, Dept Gifted Educ, POB 26671, Manama, Bahrain
关键词
Self-efficacy; Gifted students; Meta-analysis; Multilevel analysis; BELIEFS; CONSTRUCTS; MOTIVATION; BIAS; SEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2023.112244
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Self-efficacy is a major motivational factor that explains the effectiveness of people's functioning alongside cognitive and personality characteristics. However, our knowledge regarding self-efficacy among gifted students is underdeveloped. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we examined the difference in self-efficacy between gifted and non-gifted students. In total, 25 studies (m = 70; N = 42,736) were analyzed using a three-level meta -analytical approach. The unconditional model revealed the overall mean effect size was g = 0.54, SE = 0.107, 95 % CI [0.326, 0.747], p < .001, which indicates that gifted students had moderately higher self-efficacy than their non-gifted peers. However, we observed symptoms of publication bias and small-study effects. After correcting for these effects, the mean effect size was estimated as g = 0.26, SE = 0.109, 95 % CI [0.047, 0.476], p = .032, thus indicating a small to moderate difference between the groups. Moderator analyses showed that the self -efficacy domains (academic and socio-emotional), sex, and age moderated the overall effect size obtained, while culture (East vs. West) and the general, mathematical, and verbal self-efficacy domains did not signifi-cantly differentiate the obtained effects. These findings support an argument against exaggerations of differences between gifted students and their non-gifted peers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Are gifted students more emotionally intelligent than their non-gifted peers? A meta-analysis [J].
Abdulla Alabbasi, Ahmed M. ;
Ayoub, A. Alaa Eldin ;
Ziegler, Albert O. .
HIGH ABILITY STUDIES, 2021, 32 (02) :189-217
[2]  
Al-Awad W., 2019, THESIS YARMOUK U
[3]  
Al-Koumy A., 2018, THESIS CULTURAL SCI
[4]  
Al-Mazrou L., 2007, J CHILD STUD, V10, P43
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[6]   THE EXPLANATORY AND PREDICTIVE SCOPE OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :359-373
[7]  
Bandura A., 1999, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[8]  
Borenstein M., 2019, COMMON MISTAKES META
[9]  
Borenstein M., 2014, COMPREHENSIVE META A
[10]  
Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis