Numerical Strategies for Mixed-Integer Optimization of Power-Split and Gear Selection in Hybrid Electric Vehicles

被引:11
作者
Ganesan, Anand [1 ,2 ]
Gros, Sebastien [3 ]
Murgovski, Nikolce [2 ]
机构
[1] Volvo Car Corp, Res & Dev, S-40531 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Engn Cybernet, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Mixed-Integer nonlinear optimal control; non-linear programming; numerical optimization; hybrid electric vehicle; energy management; nonlinear MPC; optimal torque-split; optimal gear selection; PREDICTIVE ENERGY MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2022.3229254
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents numerical strategies for a computationally efficient energy management system that co-optimizes the power split and gear selection of a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). We formulate a mixed-integer optimal control problem (MIOCP) that is transcribed using multiple-shooting into a mixed-integer nonlinear program (MINLP) and then solved by nonlinear model predictive control. We present two different numerical strategies, a Selective Relaxation Approach (SRA), which decomposes the MINLP into several subproblems, and a Round-n-Search Approach (RSA), which is an enhancement of the known "relax-n-round' strategy. Subsequently, the resulting algorithmic performance and optimality of the solution of the proposed strategies are analyzed against two benchmark strate-gies; one using rule-based gear selection, which is typically used in production vehicles, and the other using dynamic programming (DP), which provides a global optimum of a quantized version of the MINLP. The results show that both SRA and RSA enable about 3.6% cost reduction compared to the rule-based strategy, while still being within 1% of the DP solution. Moreover, for the case studied RSA takes about 35% less mean computation time compared to SRA, while both SRA and RSA being about 99 times faster than DP. Furthermore, both SRA and RSA were able to overcome the infeasibilities encountered by a typical rounding strategy under different drive cycles. The results show the computational benefit of the proposed strategies, as well as the energy saving possibility of co-optimization strategies in which actuator dynamics are explicitly included.
引用
收藏
页码:3194 / 3210
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Ambuhl D., 2009, Ph.D. thesis, DOI [10.3929/ethz-a-005902053, DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-A-005902053]
[2]   CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control [J].
Andersson, Joel A. E. ;
Gillis, Joris ;
Horn, Greg ;
Rawlings, James B. ;
Diehl, Moritz .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING COMPUTATION, 2019, 11 (01) :1-36
[3]   DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING [J].
BELLMAN, R .
SCIENCE, 1966, 153 (3731) :34-&
[4]   Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization [J].
Belotti, Pietro ;
Kirches, Christian ;
Leyffer, Sven ;
Linderoth, Jeff ;
Luedtke, James ;
Mahajan, Ashutosh .
ACTA NUMERICA, 2013, 22 :1-131
[5]   Optimal control of switching systems [J].
Bengea, SC ;
DeCarlo, RA .
AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (01) :11-27
[6]   Analysis and Control of Torque Split in Hybrid Electric Vehicles by Incorporating Powertrain Dynamics [J].
Bidarvatan, Mehran ;
Shahbakhti, Mahdi .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (11)
[7]   Multiphase Mixed-Integer Optimal Control Approach to Aircraft Trajectory Optimization [J].
Bonami, Pierre ;
Olivares, Alberto ;
Soler, Manuel ;
Staffetti, Ernesto .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2013, 36 (05) :1267-1277
[8]  
Diehl M., 2011, NUMERICAL OPTIMAL CO
[9]   Fast Optimal Energy Management With Engine On/Off Decisions for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles [J].
East, Sebastian ;
Cannon, Mark .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS, 2019, 3 (04) :1074-1079
[10]   HPIPM: a high-performance quadratic programming framework for model predictive control [J].
Frison, Gianluca ;
Diehl, Moritz .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02) :6563-6569