The role of intermediaries in nurturing innovation ecosystems: a case study of Singapore's manufacturing sector

被引:6
作者
Ng, Huey Yuen [1 ]
Luo, Yining [2 ]
Park, Hyunkyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Inst Mfg Technol, 2 Fusionopolis Way,08-04 Innovis, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
[3] Sogang Univ, Grad Sch Technol Management, 35 Baekbeom Ro, Seoul 04107, South Korea
关键词
government-affiliated intermediary; intermediary-led innovation ecosystem; process model; manufacturing capability; innovation policy; TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; COLLABORATION; SYSTEMS; DEMAND; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scac076
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hitherto marginalized in the extant innovation studies is the role of intermediaries in innovation ecosystems, which require greater coordination and orchestration between manifold organizations. We conduct qualitative research on the Precision Engineering Centre of Innovation to understand how this government-affiliated intermediary in Singapore takes the initiative in shaping an innovation ecosystem through which local/foreign precision engineering firms, government agencies, and multinational corporations harmoniously co-develop advanced manufacturing capabilities. By analyzing the qualitative data through the theoretical lenses of innovation ecosystem and intermediary, our findings reveal that intermediaries nurture ecosystems in four major steps: (1) developing the ecosystem vision, (2) forming the ecosystem community, (3) orchestrating the ecosystem resources, and (4) materializing the new value proposition. Based on this process model, the implications for innovation intermediary research, innovation ecosystem studies, and innovation policy are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 397
页数:16
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]   Cities in old industrial regions between local innovative milieu and urban governance-reflections on city region governance [J].
Ache, P .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2000, 8 (06) :693-709
[2]  
Adner R, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98
[3]   Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [J].
Adner, Ron .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) :39-58
[4]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[5]   The evolution of the national innovation system as programmatic policy idea in Finland [J].
Alaja, Antti ;
Sorsa, Ville-Pekka .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 47 (06) :834-843
[6]   New R&D management paradigms: rethinking research and technology organizations strategies in regions [J].
Albors-Garrigos, Jose ;
Zabaleta, Noemi ;
Ganzarain, Jaione .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2010, 40 (05) :435-454
[8]  
Autio E., 2014, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P204
[9]   Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems [J].
Autio, Erkko ;
Nambisan, Satish ;
Thomas, Llewellyn D. W. ;
Wright, Mike .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) :72-95
[10]   The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector [J].
Bakici, Tuba ;
Almirall, Esteve ;
Wareham, Jonathan .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2013, 25 (03) :311-327