Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:21
作者
Zavras, Athan G. [1 ]
Federico, Vincent [1 ]
Nolte, Michael T. [1 ]
Butler, Alexander J. [1 ]
Dandu, Navya [1 ]
Munim, Mohammed [1 ]
Harper, Daniel E. [1 ]
Lopez, Gregory D. [1 ]
DeWald, Christopher J. [1 ]
An, Howard S. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
Phillips, Frank M. [1 ]
Colman, Matthew W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion; subsidence; interbody cage; complication; osteoporosis; cage position; lumbar spine; spine surgery; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; DISC DEGENERATION; CAGE SUBSIDENCE; STRUCTURAL-PROPERTIES; SPINE; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; STRENGTH; OUTCOMES; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1177/21925682221103588
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort Objective: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) may be complicated by subsidence, which can lead to significant morbidity including pain, disc space collapse, neural compression, segmental kyphosis, instability, and vertebral body fracture. This study sought to identify patient and procedural risk factors for subsidence in patients undergoing ALIF. Methods: This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a single institution with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients were grouped as either Non-Subsidence (NS-ALIF) or Cage Subsidence (CS-ALIF) based on the final postoperative radiograph. Demographic variables, operative characteristics, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated to identify significant predictors on univariate and multivariate statistics. Results: 144 patients (170 levels) were included with an average follow-up of 50.70 +/- 28.44 months (4.23 years). The incidence of subsidence was 22.94% (39/170 levels). On univariate statistics, the CS-ALIF group was significantly older (P=.020), had higher BMI (P=.048), worse ASA (P=.001), higher prevalence of comorbid osteoporosis (P<.001), and a more anteriorly placed interbody device (P=.005). On multivariate analysis, anterior cage placement remained the only significant predictor (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; P=.003). There was a significantly higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery among the CS-ALIF group (P=.035). Conclusion: Factors contributing to subsidence in ALIF included older age, higher BMI, severe ASA, and osteoporosis, while anterior cage placement remained the only independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Subsidence was associated with a higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery. Surgical technique should optimize placement of the interbody cage and avoid overstuffing the disc space.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation [J].
Abbushi, Alexander ;
Cabraja, Mario ;
Thomale, Ulrich-Wilhelm ;
Woiciechowsky, Christian ;
Kroppenstedt, Stefan Nikolaus .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (11) :1621-1628
[2]   Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location [J].
Anderst, William J. ;
Thorhauer, Eric D. ;
Lee, Joon Y. ;
Donaldson, William F. ;
Kang, James D. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (07) :659-667
[3]   Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 [J].
Behrbalk, Eyal ;
Uri, Ofir ;
Parks, Ruth M. ;
Musson, Rachel ;
Soh, Reuben Chee Cheong ;
Boszczyk, Bronek Maximilian .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (12) :2869-2875
[4]  
Beutler William J, 2003, Spine J, V3, P289, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00061-5
[5]  
BRIDWELL KH, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1410, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199520120-00014
[6]   Does Spanning a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Cage Across the Vertebral Ring Apophysis Increase Loads Required for Failure and Mitigate Endplate Violation [J].
Briski, David C. ;
Goel, Vijay K. ;
Waddell, Bradford S. ;
Serhan, Hassan ;
Kodigudla, Manoj K. ;
Palepu, Vivek ;
Agarwal, Anand K. ;
Zavatsky, Joseph M. .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (20) :E1158-E1164
[7]   Is there any advantage of using stand-alone cages? A numerical approach [J].
Calvo-Echenique, Andrea ;
Cegonino, Jose ;
Perez del Palomar, Amaya .
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2019, 18
[8]   Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Cho, Jae Hwan ;
Hwang, Chang Ju ;
Kim, Hyojune ;
Joo, Youn-Suk ;
Lee, Dong-Ho ;
Lee, Choon Sung .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (06) :870-877
[9]   Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages [J].
Choi, JY ;
Sung, KH .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (01) :16-22
[10]   Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis [J].
Choi, Kyung-Chul ;
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik ;
Lee, Sang-Ho ;
Kim, Yeong Hyeon ;
Lee, Sung Jae ;
Park, Chun-Kun .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14