The dark and bright side of network complexity: Novel insights from an asymmetric supply chain recovery and disruption approach

被引:5
作者
Asafo-Adjei, Emmanuel [1 ]
Hamidu, Zulaiha [2 ]
Issau, Kassimu [2 ]
Seidu, Baba Adibura [3 ]
Adam, Anokye. M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Coast, Sch Business, Dept Finance, Cape Coast, Ghana
[2] Univ Cape Coast, Sch Business, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, Cape Coast, Ghana
[3] Univ Profess Studies, Dept Accounting, Accra, Ghana
关键词
Supply complexity; customer complexity; logistics complexity; supply chain resilience; supply chain disruption; asymmetric approach; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; PLS-SEM; RESILIENCE; PERSPECTIVES; CAPABILITIES; LOGISTICS; READINESS; MODELS; RISKS;
D O I
10.1080/23311975.2023.2225808
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent studies have conceptualized the potential for a dark and bright perspective of network complexity in relation to supply chain disruption and resilience respectively. Few empirical studies have been conducted on the relationship among supply chain network complexity, supply chain disruption and supply chain resilience. However, prior studies have not yet investigated how different measures of network complexity relate to both resilience strategies and disruption. The current study, therefore, examines the dark and bright side of supply chain network complexity dimensions using supply chain disruption (SCD) and three supply chain resilience (SCR) strategies (collaboration, flexibility and redundancy) as endogenous variables. The dimensions of the supply chain network complexity utilised in this study are-supply complexity (SNC), customer complexity (CNC), and logistics complexity (LNC) whereas the three SCR strategies considered included; collaboration, flexibility and redundancy. The study uses PLS-SEM and a sample of 690 manufacturing firms in Accra Metropolis. Results show that supply complexity has a positive relationship with both disruption and resilience strategies, while customer complexity is only related to disruption, and logistics complexity is related to all resilience strategies. The study provides theoretical, practical, and political implications.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 95 条
[61]   Multiple-node basin stability in complex dynamical networks [J].
Mitra, Chiranjit ;
Choudhary, Anshul ;
Sinha, Sudeshna ;
Kurths, Juergen ;
Donner, Reik V. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 95 (03)
[62]   Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: learning from Covid-19 [J].
Modgil, Sachin ;
Singh, Rohit Kumar ;
Hannibal, Claire .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (04) :1246-1268
[63]   Resilience and cleaner production in industry 4.0: Role of supply chain mapping and visibility [J].
Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat ;
Naghavi, Navaz ;
Mubarik, Mobashar ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed ;
Zaman, Syed Imran ;
Kazmi, Syed Hasnain Alam .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 292
[64]  
Pallant Julie., 2016, SPSS Survival Manual, V6th
[65]  
Parast M.M., 2019, Revisiting supply chain risk, P367, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_2110, 10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_21, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_21]
[66]   Publishing quantitative papers with rigor and transparency [J].
Pesamaa, Ossi ;
Zwikael, Ofer ;
Hair, Joe F., Jr. ;
Huemann, Martina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 39 (03) :217-222
[67]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[68]   Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience [J].
Ponomarov, Serhiy Y. ;
Holcomb, Mary C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 20 (01) :124-143
[69]  
Quarshie D., 2017, EUROPEAN J BUSINESS, V5
[70]  
Ringle CM, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, pIII