Comparative evaluation of optimal Weibull parameters for wind power predictions using numerical and metaheuristic optimization methods for different Indian terrains

被引:10
作者
Patidar, Harsh [1 ]
Shende, Vikas [1 ]
Baredar, Prashant [1 ]
Soni, Archana [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Natl Inst Technol Bhopal MP, Energy Ctr, Bhopal, India
关键词
Social spider optimization; Weibull distribution; Particle swarm optimization; Offshore wind energy assessment; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; ENERGY; SPEED; FARM;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24395-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The accurate selection of the wind speed distributions is crucial for a better utilisation of wind energy. The Weibull distribution is most commonly used distribution and hence its parameters need to be optimized. In this study five numerical methods, namely, maximum likelihood method (MLM), graphical method (GM), empirical method of Justus (EMJ), modified maximum likelihood method (MMLM) and wind atlas analysis and application program (WAsP) and three metaheuristic optimization algorithms, namely, social spider optimization (SSO), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) are applied for estimating Weibull distribution parameters at three different locations (onshore-Kayathar, nearshore-Jafrabad and offshore-Gulf of Khambhat (GOK) in India and also comparison of numerical and optimization methods are employed to tune the optimal parameters. The accuracy of the methods was evaluated using three different statistical analysis techniques. As per the results, GOK has the maximum wind power density of 450.2 W/m(2) compared to Jafrabad and Kayathar. It was observed that among the five methods used for Weibull parameters estimation, WAsP method presented a better curve fit with the histogram of the wind speed. The results shows that SSO and PSO presents a comparably better performance than GA in the term of accuracy on the basis of closeness to converged solution.
引用
收藏
页码:30874 / 30891
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Akin A, 2016, COST CO2 OPTIMIZATIO, DOI [10.18552/2016/SCMT4S145, DOI 10.18552/2016/SCMT4S145]
[2]  
Alhems LM, 2022, SUSTAINABLE ENERGY D, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-76221-6_74, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-76221-6_74]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Particle Swarm Optimization
[4]   Assessment of wind energy potential over Ontario and Great Lakes using the NARR data: 1980-2012 [J].
Ashtine, Masao ;
Bello, Richard ;
Higuchi, Kaz .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 :272-282
[5]   Statistical Diagnosis of the Best Weibull Methods for Wind Power Assessment for Agricultural Applications [J].
Azad, Abul Kalam ;
Rasul, Mohammad Golam ;
Yusaf, Talal .
ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (05) :3056-3085
[6]   Wind speed and power characteristics for Jubail industrial city, Saudi Arabia [J].
Baseer, M. A. ;
Meyer, J. P. ;
Alain, Md Mahbub ;
Rehman, S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :1193-1204
[7]   Comparison of Weibull Estimation Methods for Diverse Winds [J].
Bingol, Ferhat .
ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2020, 2020
[8]   Assessment of wind power potential in the coastal region of Tamil Nadu, India [J].
Boopathi, K. ;
Kushwaha, Rakhi ;
Balaraman, K. ;
Bastin, J. ;
Kanagavel, P. ;
Prasad, Reddy D. M. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2021, 219
[9]   Investigation of wind power potential at Oran, northwest of Algeria [J].
Boudia, Sidi Mohammed ;
Guerri, Ouahiba .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 105 :81-92
[10]   Particle Swarm Optimization method for estimation of Weibull parameters: A case study for the Brazilian northeast region [J].
Carneiro, Tatiane C. ;
Melo, Sofia P. ;
Carvalho, Paulo C. M. ;
Braga, Arthur Plinio de S. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 86 :751-759