Development and validation of a practical clinical risk prediction model for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

被引:2
作者
Meng, Zhao Wu [1 ,2 ]
Ruan, Yibing [3 ,4 ]
Fisher, Stacey [5 ]
Bishay, Kirles [1 ,2 ]
Chau, Millie [2 ]
Howarth, Megan [2 ]
Cartwright, Shane [2 ]
Chen, Yen-, I [6 ]
Dixon, Elijah [1 ,7 ]
Heitman, Steven J. [1 ,2 ]
Brenner, Darren R. [1 ,3 ]
Forbes, Nauzer [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Alberta Hlth Serv, Dept Canc Epidemiol & Prevent Res, Canc Care Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Dept Surg, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, CWPH 6D19,3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
来源
DEN OPEN | 2024年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
adverse event; endoscopy; ERCP; pancreatitis; prediction; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1002/deo2.355
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop an accurate post-ERCP pancreatitis risk prediction model using easily obtainable variables.MethodsUsing prospective multi-center ERCP data, we performed logistic regression using stepwise selection on several patient-, procedure-, and endoscopist-related factors that were determined a priori. The final model was based on a combination of the Bayesian information criterion and Akaike's information criterion performance, balancing the inclusion of clinically relevant variables and model parsimony. All available data were used for model development, with subsequent internal validation performed on bootstrapped data using 10-fold cross-validation.ResultsData from 3021 ERCPs were used to inform models. There were 151 cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis (5.0% incidence). Variables included in the final model included female sex, pancreatic duct cannulation, native papilla status, pre-cut sphincterotomy, increasing cannulation time, presence of biliary stricture, patient age, and placement of a pancreatic duct stent. The final model was discriminating, with a receiver operating characteristic curve statistic of 0.79, and well-calibrated, with a predicted risk-to-observed risk ratio of 1.003.ConclusionsWe successfully developed and internally validated a promising post-ERCP pancreatitis clinical prediction model using easily obtainable variables that are known at baseline or observed during the ERCP procedure. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.79. External validation is planned as additional data becomes available.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 randomized controlled trials
    Akshintala, Venkata S.
    Kanthasamy, Kavin
    Bhullar, Furqan A.
    Weiland, Christina J. Sperna
    Kamal, Ayesha
    Kochar, Bharati
    Gurakar, Merve
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    Kumbhari, Vivek
    Brewer-Gutierrez, Olaya I.
    Kalloo, Anthony N.
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    van Geenen, Erwin-Jan M.
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 98 (01) : 1 - 6.e12
  • [2] Akshintala VS, 2019, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V156, pS116
  • [3] Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: A systematic survey of prospective studies
    Andriulli, Angelo
    Loperfido, Silvano
    Napolitano, Grazia
    Niro, Grazia
    Valvano, Maria Rosa
    Spirito, Fulvio
    Pilotto, Alberto
    Forlano, Rosario
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (08) : 1781 - 1788
  • [4] Practice patterns of post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis techniques in the United States: a survey of advanced endoscopists
    Avila, Patrick
    Holmes, Ian
    Kouanda, Abdul
    Arain, Mustafa
    Dai, Sun-Chuan
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (03) : 568 - +
  • [5] American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: summary and recommendations
    Buxbaum, James L.
    Freeman, Martin
    Amateau, Stuart K.
    Chalhoub, Jean M.
    Coelho-Prabhu, Nayantara
    Desai, Madhav
    Elhanafi, Sherif E.
    Forbes, Nauzer
    Fujii-Lau, Larissa L.
    Kohli, Divyanshoo R.
    Kwon, Richard S.
    Machicado, Jorge D.
    Marya, Neil B.
    Pawa, Swati
    Ruan, Wenly H.
    Sheth, Sunil G.
    Thiruvengadam, Nikhil R.
    Thosani, Nirav C.
    Qumseya, Bashar J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (02) : 153 - 162
  • [6] American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: methodology and review of evidence
    Buxbaum, James L.
    Freeman, Martin
    Amateau, Stuart K.
    Chalhoub, Jean M.
    Chowdhury, Aneesa
    Coelho-Prabhu, Nayantara
    Das, Rishi
    Desai, Madhav
    Elhanafi, Sherif E.
    Forbes, Nauzer
    Fujii-Lau, Larissa L.
    Kohli, Divyanshoo R.
    Kwon, Richard S.
    Machicado, Jorge D.
    Marya, Neil B.
    Pawa, Swati
    Ruan, Wenly H.
    Sadik, Jonathan
    Sheth, Sunil G.
    Thiruvengadam, Nikhil R.
    Thosani, Nirav C.
    Zhou, Selena
    Qumseya, Bashar J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (02) : 163 - +
  • [7] Adverse events associated with ERCP
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Acosta, Ruben D.
    Agrawal, Deepak
    Bruining, David H.
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    Fanelli, Robert D.
    Faulx, Ashley L.
    Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
    Kothari, Shivangi
    Lightdale, Jenifer R.
    Qumseya, Bashar J.
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Wang, Amy
    Wani, Sachin B.
    Yang, Julie
    DeWitt, John M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (01) : 32 - 47
  • [8] Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling
    Chowdhury, Mohammad Ziaul Islam
    Turin, Tanvir C.
    [J]. FAMILY MEDICINE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [9] A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
    Christodoulou, Evangelia
    Ma, Jie
    Collins, Gary S.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Verbakel, Jan Y.
    Van Calster, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 : 12 - 22
  • [10] Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025]