BHARAT: A simple and effective multi-criteria decision-making method that does not need fuzzy logic, Part-1: Multi-attribute decision-making applications in the industrial environment

被引:7
作者
Rao, Ravipudi Venkata [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol, Surat 395007, Gujarat, India
关键词
Multi-attribute decision-; making; BHARAT; Ranking of attributes; Evaluation of alternatives; Fuzzy-logic; Simple linear scales; Total scores;
D O I
10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.12.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A simple and effective multi-criteria decision-making methodology named as "Best Holistic Adaptable Ranking of Attributes Technique (BHARAT)" is proposed that can be used in single-as well as group decision-making scenarios of the industrial environment. The attributes data for various alternatives can be quantitative or qualitative (i.e., expressed in linguistic terms). This paper proposes to transform the qualitative attributes into quantitative attributes by means of simple linear scales rather than complex fuzzy scales. The proposed BHARAT method normalizes the data with reference to the "best" alternative corresponding to an attribute and the normalization procedure is repeated for all the attributes to get the normalized data. A group of decision-makers or a decision maker assigns ranks to the attributes according to how important they are deemed to be, and these ranks are then transformed into the proper weights. The total scores of the alternatives are calculated by multiplying the weights of the attributes by the corresponding normalized data of the attributes for different alternatives. Four industrial case studies are presented to illustrate the potential of the suggested BHARAT method. The first case study deals with the problem of an automated warehouse selection for a large industrial plant involving a single decision-maker, 13 attributes, and 4 alternative warehouses; the second case study deals with the problem of sustainable maintenance service provider selection for a large petrochemical plant involving fuzzy group decision-making with 5 decision-makers, 9 attributes, and 4 alternative maintenance service providers; the third case study deals with the problem of alternative strategy selection for implementation of a make-to-order system for passenger car manufacturers involving 6 factors, 18 sub-factors, and 3 alternative strategies; and the fourth case study deals with the problem of process parameters selection in a sustainable high speed turning operation involving 4 attributes and 9 alternative sets of experimental conditions. The results of the proposed decision-making method and its second version are compared with the other popular decision-making methods. The proposed method and its another version are proved simple, effective, powerful, flexible, easy to apply, do not require the use of fuzzy logic, offer logical and consistent procedures to assign weights to the attributes, and are applicable to different decision-making scenarios of the industries. Part-1 of this paper describes the applications of the BHARAT method to multi-attribute decision making problems and Part-2 describes the evaluation of Pareto solutions using the BHARAT method in multiple objective decision-making problems.(c) 2024 by the authors; licensee Growing Science, Canada
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 40
页数:28
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] On multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modeling in group decision making problems: A systematic review and future trends
    Morente-Molinera, J. A.
    Perez, I. J.
    Urena, M. R.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2015, 74 : 49 - 60
  • [2] Rao R V., 2021, Soft Computing Letters, V3, P15, DOI [10.1016/j.socl.2021.100015, DOI 10.1016/J.SOCL.2021.100015]
  • [3] R-method: A simple ranking method for multi-attribute decision-making in the industrial environment
    Rao, Ravipudi Venkata
    Lakshmi, Jaya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 6 (04) : 223 - 230
  • [4] Rao RVenkata., 2013, Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision-making Methods, V2
  • [5] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [6] Roszkowska E., 2013, Optimum. Econ. Stud, V65, P14, DOI [DOI 10.15290/OSE.2013.05.65.02, 10.15290/ose.2013.05.65.02]
  • [7] Saaty T. L., 1989, AHP: the analytic hierarchy process, P59, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-50244-64, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-64]
  • [8] Singh D., 2012, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF WEIGHT APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUES IN MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY DECISION-MAKING
    STILLWELL, WG
    SEAVER, DA
    EDWARDS, W
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 28 (01): : 62 - 77
  • [10] Sustainable maintenance supplier performance evaluation based on an extend fuzzy PROMETHEE II approach in petrochemical industry
    Tong, Lizhong
    Pu, Zhongmin
    Chen, Ke
    Yi, Jiajia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273