The relation between cochlear implant programming levels and speech perception performance in post-lingually deafened adults: a data-driven approach

被引:2
作者
Migliorini, Enrico [1 ,2 ]
van Dijk, Bastiaan [3 ]
Philips, Birgit [1 ]
Mylanus, Emmanuel [2 ]
Huinck, Wendy [2 ]
机构
[1] Cochlear Technol Ctr Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Cochlear Benelux NV, Mechelen, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Deafness; Cochlear implants; Retrospective; Speech perception; Prosthetics fitting; RECIPIENT-DIRECTED DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; STIMULATION LEVELS; DYNAMIC-RANGE; C-LEVELS; RECOGNITION; THRESHOLDS; SETTINGS; USERS; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-023-08195-3
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose Programming a cochlear implant (fitting) is an essential part of a user's post-implantation journey, defining how sound will be translated into electrical stimulation and aiming to provide optimal speech perception outcomes. Currently, there are no established, evidence-based guidelines for fitting cochlear implant users, leading to a high degree of variability in fitting practices, users' parameters, and probably outcomes. In this study a data-driven approach is used to retrospectively investigate the relation between cochlear implant fitting parameters and speech perception outcomes in post-lingually deafened adults.Methods 298 data points corresponding to fitting parameters and speech audiometry test results for the same number of adult, post-lingually deafened, experienced CI users were analyzed. Correlation analysis was performed, after which parameters from the top-scoring and bottom-scoring tertiles were compared via the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon u test.Results Weak correlations between dynamic range and speech audiometry outcomes were identified, having p values lower than (albeit close to) 0.05. A significant (p < 0.05) difference in electrical dynamic range (the difference between the minimum and maximum amount of current which may be delivered by each electrode) was found, with top-scoring subjects having on average a wider dynamic range.Conclusion The association between dynamic range and speech perception outcomes shown in this retrospective study highlights the need for deeper investigation into evidence-driven fitting. It might be a first step in the direction of evidence-based fitting, minimizing variability in outcomes for cochlear implant users and helping mitigate the issue of unexplained low performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1173
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Baskent D, 2007, EAR HEARING, V28, P370
  • [2] Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition
    Beyea, Jason A.
    McMullen, Kyle P.
    Harris, Michael S.
    Houston, Derek M.
    Martin, Jennifer M.
    Bolster, Virginia A.
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (09) : 1238 - 1245
  • [3] Bosman A. J., 1989, SPEECH PERCEPTION HE
  • [4] Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant
    Boyd, Paul J.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2006, 27 (06) : 608 - 618
  • [5] Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Busby, Peter A.
    Arora, Komal
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (03) : 303 - 311
  • [6] The influence of stimulation levels on auditory thresholds and speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users
    Chaves Martins, Kelly Vasconcelos
    Schmidt Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria
    [J]. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 22 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [7] Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Fitting Parameters, Impedances and ECAP Thresholds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users
    de Graaff, Feike
    Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
    Kaandorp, Marre W.
    Merkus, Paul
    Goverts, S. Theo
    Kramer, Sophia E.
    Smits, Cas
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (04) : 935 - 947
  • [8] De Quillettes R, 2022, HEAL2022 C
  • [9] Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems
    Firszt, JB
    Holden, LK
    Skinner, MW
    Tobey, EA
    Peterson, A
    Gaggl, W
    Runge-Samuelson, CL
    Wackym, PA
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (04) : 375 - 387
  • [10] Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation (vol 141, pg 2, 2011)
    Fritz, Catherine O.
    Morris, Peter E.
    Richler, Jennifer J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2012, 141 (01) : 30 - 30