Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test Result for Colorectal Cancer Among Health Care Organizations in the US, 2017-2020

被引:41
作者
Mohl, Jeff T. [1 ]
Ciemins, Elizabeth L. [1 ]
Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann [2 ]
Gillen, Abbie [1 ]
Luo, Roger [2 ]
Colangelo, Francis [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Med Grp Assoc, Alexandria, VA USA
[2] Exact Sci, Madison, WI USA
[3] Allegheny Hlth Network, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
BLOOD-TEST; TIME; STRATEGIES; ADHERENCE; RISK; FIT;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51384
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceNoninvasive stool-based screening tests (SBTs) are effective alternatives to colonoscopy. However, a positive SBT result requires timely follow-up colonoscopy (FU-CY) to complete the colorectal cancer screening paradigm. ObjectivesTo evaluate FU-CY rates after a positive SBT result and to assess the association of the early COVID-19 pandemic with FU-CY rates. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis mixed-methods cohort study included retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative claims and electronic health records data between June 1, 2015, and June 30, 2021, from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse and qualitative, semistructured interviews with clinicians from 5 health care organizations (HCOs). The study population included data from average-risk primary care patients aged 50 to 75 years with a positive SBT result between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, at 39 HCOs. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the FU-CY rate within 1 year of a positive SBT result according to patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and prior SBT use. ResultsThis cohort study included 32769 individuals (16 929 [51.7%] female; mean [SD] age, 63.1 [7.1] years; 2092 [6.4%] of Black and 28832 [88.0%] of White race; and 825 [2.5%] of Hispanic ethnicity). The FU-CY rates were 43.3% within 90 days of the positive SBT result, 51.4% within 180 days, and 56.1% within 360 days (n=32769). In interviews, clinicians were uniformly surprised by the low FU-CY rates. Rates varied by race, ethnicity, insurance type, presence of comorbidities, and SBT used. In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the strongest positive association was with multitarget stool DNA use (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.57-1.68] relative to fecal immunochemical tests; P<.001), and the strongest negative association was with the presence of comorbidities (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.71] for a CCI of >4 relative to 0; P<.001). The early COVID-19 pandemic was associated with lower FU-CY rates. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that FU-CY rates after a positive SBT result for colorectal cancer screening were low among an average-risk population, with the median HCO achieving a 53.4% FU-CY rate within 1 year. Socioeconomic factors and the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with lower FU-CY rates, presenting opportunities for targeted intervention by clinicians and health care systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Allen M., 2017, SAGE ENCY COMMUNICAT, DOI [10.4135/9781483381411.n605, 10.4135/9781483381411, DOI 10.4135/9781483381411]
  • [2] Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults
    Andersen, Shaneda Warren
    Blot, William J.
    Lipworth, Loren
    Steinwandel, Mark
    Murff, Harvey J.
    Zheng, Wei
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (12) : E1917995
  • [3] Patterns of initial colorectal cancer screenings after turning 50 years old and follow-up rates of colonoscopy after positive stool-based testing among the average-risk population
    Austin, George
    Kowalkowski, Henrik
    Guo, Yinglong
    Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann
    Byfield, Stacey DaCosta
    Verma, Prat
    Housman, Laura
    Berke, Ethan
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 (01) : 47 - 61
  • [4] Association between time to colonoscopy after a positive guaiac fecal test result and risk of colorectal cancer and advanced stage disease at diagnosis
    Beshara, Amani
    Ahoroni, Maya
    Comanester, Doron
    Vilkin, Alex
    Boltin, Doron
    Dotan, Iris
    Niv, Yaron
    Cohen, Arnon D.
    Levi, Zohar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 146 (06) : 1532 - 1540
  • [5] Diagnostic colonoscopy completion after abnormal fecal immunochemical testing and quality of tests used at 8 Federally Qualified Health Centers in Southern California: Opportunities for improving screening outcomes
    Bharti, Balambal
    May, Folasade Popoola
    Nodora, Jesse
    Martinez, Maria Elena
    Moyano, Karina
    Davis, Shauntay L.
    Ramers, Christian B.
    Garcia-Bigley, Felipe
    O'Connell, Shawne
    Ronan, Kevin
    Barajas, Melissa
    Gordon, Sheree
    Diaz, Giselle
    Ceja, Evelyn
    Powers, Meghan
    Arredondo, Elva M.
    Gupta, Samir
    [J]. CANCER, 2019, 125 (23) : 4203 - 4209
  • [6] Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four US Health Care Systems
    Chubak, Jessica
    Garcia, Michael P.
    Burnett-Hartman, Andrea N.
    Zheng, Yingye
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Halm, Ethan A.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Klabunde, Carrie N.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Kamineni, Aruna
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Schottinger, Joanne E.
    Green, Beverly B.
    Quinn, Virginia P.
    Rutter, Carolyn M.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (02) : 344 - 350
  • [7] Barriers to Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Positive FIT or Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
    Cooper, Gregory S.
    Grimes, Ashley
    Werner, James
    Cao, Shufen
    Fu, Pingfu
    Stange, Kurt C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [8] Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Jensen, Christopher D.
    Quinn, Virginia P.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Lee, Jeffrey K.
    Schottinger, Joanne E.
    Marks, Amy R.
    Zhao, Wei K.
    Ghai, Nirupa R.
    Lee, Alexander T.
    Contreras, Richard
    Quesenberry, Charles P.
    Fireman, Bruce H.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (16): : 1631 - 1641
  • [9] Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Cabana, Michael
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Davis, Esa M.
    Donahue, Katrina E.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Krist, Alex H.
    Kubik, Martha
    Li, Li
    Ogedegbe, Gbenga
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Pbert, Lori
    Silverstein, Michael
    Stevermer, James
    Tseng, Chien-Wen
    Wong, John B.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (19): : 1965 - 1977
  • [10] Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Emerging Learning on Real-world Performance
    Jason D. Eckmann
    Derek W. Ebner
    John B. Kisiel
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2020, 18 (1) : 109 - 119