Environmental Regulation and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Chinese Carbon Emission Trading Pilot

被引:6
作者
Zheng, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Omori, Akira [2 ]
Cao, Jin [2 ]
Guo, Xuemeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Yokohama Natl Univ, Grad Sch Int Social Sci, Yokohama 2408501, Japan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chinese carbon emission trading pilot; corporate environmental performance; lowering production level channel; corporate environmental pressures; internal control quality; CO2; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; COMPETITIVENESS;
D O I
10.3390/su15118518
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using archival data of the Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2019, this article empirically examines the effectiveness of the Chinese carbon emission trading pilot, from the perspective of market-ranked corporate environmental performance. The main findings demonstrate that compared with companies not selected in the pilot, regulated enterprises tend to create a better environmental performance after the implementation of the pilot. Second, regarding the two possible influential channels, the lowering production level channel is empirically supported, while the increasing green investment channel lacks salient explanatory power. Finally, greater environmental pressures and better internal control quality present synergistic effects in amplifying the positive connection between the pilot and corporate environmental performance. Our conclusions remain valid under various robustness test methods. Potential related directions for future research are also identified and suggested in this article. Overall, using the Chinese carbon emission trading pilot as a research setting, our study provides additional evidence on whether and how environmental regulations affect corporate environmental performance ranked by capital market participants.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Aghion P, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P1
  • [2] Carbon resource reallocation with emission quota in carbon emission trading system
    An, Qingxian
    Zhu, Kefan
    Xiong, Beibei
    Shen, Zhiyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 327
  • [3] THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BARON, RM
    KENNY, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) : 1173 - 1182
  • [4] The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices
    Bayer, Patrick
    Aklin, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (16) : 8804 - 8812
  • [5] Does carbon emission trading improve low-carbon technical efficiency? Evidence from China
    Cai, Wugan
    Ye, Peiyun
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 29 : 46 - 56
  • [6] Emission trading and international competition: The impact of labor market rigidity on technology adoption and output
    Caparros, Alejandro
    Pereau, Jean-Christophe
    Tazdait, Tank
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 36 - 43
  • [7] Environmental innovation and environmental performance
    Carrion-Flores, Carmen E.
    Innes, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 59 (01) : 27 - 42
  • [8] Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme
    Chan, Hei Sing
    Li, Shanjun
    Zhang, Fan
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 1056 - 1064
  • [9] Do environmental regulations of carbon emissions and air pollution foster green technology innovation: Evidence from China's prefecture-level cities
    Chen, Yanyun
    Yao, Ziyan
    Zhong, Ke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [10] Does the carbon emission trading scheme boost corporate environmental and financial performance in China?
    Chen, Yi
    Xu, Zhongwen
    Zhang, Zhixiao
    Ye, Weili
    Yang, Yining
    Gong, Zhengjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 368