Femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients: femoral neck system versus cannulated cancellous screw

被引:8
作者
Kenmegne, Guy Romeo [1 ]
Zou, Chang [1 ]
Fang, Yue [1 ]
He, Xuanhong [2 ]
Lin, Yixiang [1 ]
Yin, Yijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Trauma Ctr, Chengdu 610044, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Orthopaed Res Inst, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Cannulated cancellous screw; Femoral neck fracture; Femoral neck system; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; INTERNAL-FIXATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06140-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe fractures of femoral neck account for 50% among hip fractures with around 3%-10% occurring in younger population of below 65 years. The newly introduced FNS as management approach appears to be a potential alternative to the traditional CCS. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and outcome of the femoral neck system (FNS) and the cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adult below 65 years of age.MethodsData of 114 patients between 18-65 years, admitted in our department for femoral neck fracture from January 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively studied and ranged into two groups based on the surgical methods: FNS group (56 patients) and CCS group (58 patients). The variables of interest including demographic and clinical variables (age, gender, fracture mechanism, injury side and classification), perioperative parameters(operation time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length and hospitalization time), postoperative outcomes and complications (fracture healing time, nonunion rate, femoral neck avascular necrosis, aseptic screw loosening and the Harris Hip Score), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.ResultsAll 114 patients presented satisfactory reduction and were followed-up for a period of 12 to 36 months (mean 27 +/- 2.07 months); there were no significant differences between both groups in terms of age, gender, fracture classification, side of injury, mechanism of injury, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the hospital length of stay. However, the fracture healing time between FNS group and CCS group was statistically significant (p < 0.05), respectively 2.86 +/- 0.77 and 5.10 +/- 0.81 months. The significant differences were also found in terms of numbers of fluoroscopies 8.34 +/- 1.38 Vs 17.72 +/- 2.19, the HHS 87.80 +/- 1.92 Vs 84.28 +/- 2.24, postoperative complications 8 (14.28%) Vs 26 (44.82) respectively in FNS and CCS group.ConclusionFNS presented satisfactory outcomes had significantly lower complications rate, therefore, can be one of the alternatives for internal implantation devices in treatment of femoral neck fracture in non-geriatric population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical evaluation of the expansive cannulated screw for fixation of femoral neck fractures
    Zhang, Yang
    Tian, Li
    Yan, Yabo
    Sang, Hongxun
    Ma, Zhensheng
    Jie, Qiang
    Lei, Wei
    Wu, Zixiang
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (11): : 1372 - 1376
  • [42] Cannulated screws versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in demented patients
    van Dortmont, LMC
    Douw, CM
    van Breukelen, AMA
    Laurens, DR
    Mulder, PGH
    Wereldsma, JCJ
    van Vugt, AB
    ANNALES CHIRURGIAE ET GYNAECOLOGIAE, 2000, 89 (02) : 132 - 137
  • [43] Comparison of femoral neck system and three cannulated cancellous screws in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures: clinical observation and finite element analysis
    Shaolong Huang
    Yazhong Zhang
    Xu Zhang
    Chengqiang Zhou
    Wenbo Li
    Yunqing Wang
    Bin Wang
    Ziqiang Zhu
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 22
  • [44] Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study
    Shu, Dong-Ping
    Xiao, Ya-Ping
    Bei, Ming-Jian
    Ji, Tao
    Peng, Yong-Jun
    Ma, Bing
    Li, Shao-Gang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [45] Biomechanical comparison of antirotator compression hip screw and cannulated screw fixations in the femoral neck fractures
    Saglam, Necdet
    Kucukdurmaz, Fatih
    Kivilcim, Hakan
    Kurtulmus, Tuhan
    Sen, Cengiz
    Akpinar, Fuat
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2014, 48 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [46] Factors associated with early failure of the femoral neck system (FNS) in patients with femoral neck fractures
    Chen, L.
    Jiang, J. B.
    Ma, H.
    Duan, X.
    Chen, J. L.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [47] Comparative analysis of the femoral neck system (FNS) vs. cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) in the treatment of Middle-aged and elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: clinical outcomes and biomechanical insights
    Xu, Zhi
    Sun, Jun
    Li, Junjie
    Huang, Feng
    Zhao, Jinxiang
    Shao, Yiping
    Fang, Shuping
    Wang, Ziru
    Gong, Yu
    Zhou, Hao
    Tian, Shoujin
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [48] Pre-sliding of the femoral neck system to prevent postoperative shortening of femoral neck fractures
    Lin, Dongze
    Zhu, Fugui
    Chen, Peisheng
    Lin, Chaohui
    Chen, Bin
    Zheng, Ke
    Zheng, Shunze
    Lin, Fengfei
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [49] Should a low starting point be abandoned for cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures?
    Wodarek, Jeremy
    Ostrander, James
    Atkinson, Patrick
    Atkinson, Theresa
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [50] Sliding hip screw versus cannulated cancellous screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults: A systematic review
    Ma, Jian-xiong
    Kuang, Ming-jie
    Xing, Fei
    Zhao, Yun-long
    Chen, Heng-ting
    Zhang, Lu-kai
    Fan, Zheng-rui
    Han, Chao
    Ma, Xin-long
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 89 - 97