Shared Value Creation in Equivocal CSR Environments: A Configuration Approach

被引:6
作者
Aronson, Olivia [1 ]
Henriques, Irene [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
[2] York Univ, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
Configurations; Corporate social responsibility; Corporate entrepreneurship; Equivocality; Stakeholder engagement; Shared value creation; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; INNOVATION; WORLD; EXPERIMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONS; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-022-05260-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organizations are increasingly expected by their stakeholders to tackle the "wicked" problems of society. These new pressures have created a highly equivocal corporate social responsibility (CSR) environment whereby firms face competing stakeholder perspectives regarding their CSR strategy. To reduce CSR environmental equivocality and determine a CSR strategy, organizations need to effectively and efficiently identify, evaluate, and exploit CSR initiatives to create financial and social value (i.e., shared value). In this paper, we explain how organizations can optimize their shared value creation and promote the construction of intersubjective agreement, which can reduce CSR environmental equivocality. Theory is put forth that explains how the proper alignment of an organization's level of CSR environmental equivocality, which is comprised of varying amounts of "unknowingness," corporate entrepreneurship strategy, which promotes experimentation, and stakeholder engagement process, which facilitates information gathering and dissemination, supports the construction of intersubjective agreement. A typology of organizational shared value creation in equivocal CSR environments with four "ideal types" of organizations-Container, Explorer, Embracer, and Manager-is presented and an organization's choice among and movement between types discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 732
页数:20
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Agren D., 2020, USA TODAY
[2]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[3]  
Anderson R., 2009, CONFESSIONS RADICAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Economist18 March
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, FINANC TIMES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AMNESTY INT
[7]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[8]   Examining the Institutional and Organizational Antecedents to Organizational Participation in Environmental Management [J].
Aronson, Olivia ;
LaFont, Matthew .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 35 (01) :57-78
[9]   Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation? [J].
Ayuso, Silvia ;
Angel Rodriguez, Miguel ;
Garcia-Castro, Roberto ;
Angel Arino, Miguel .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2011, 111 (8-9) :1399-1417
[10]  
Barnett ML, 2020, V5, P137