The Quality of Environmental Data Disclosure. The case of Public Companies from the European Union Countries

被引:2
作者
Janicka, Malgorzata [1 ]
Sajnog, Artur [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lodz, Fac Econ & Sociol, Dept Int Finance & Investment, Lodz, Poland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | 2023年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
environmental disclosure; environmental reporting; ESG; European Union; public companies;
D O I
10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n4p149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the 21st century business entities are required to change priorities and move to a sustainable relationship between environmental, social, and economic well-being. Climate and environment are phenomena of transnational and global nature, and for this reason, actions in this area should be taken at a supranational level. Nowadays, the European Union (EU) countries have been implementing directives concerning environmental changes and taxonomy for non-financial reporting. According to their requirements, public companies must disclose high-quality data in the ESG area, including the environmental indicator (E) and its components. The purpose of the study is to discuss the current state of disclosure of environmental data by public companies listed on the regulated markets of the European Union. Special emphasis is devoted to energy consumption, water, waste production, and CO2 emissions. To test the quality of environmental indicators, we used the Refinitiv database. The research period covers 2012-2021. The research sample consists of public companies listed on the leading stock markets in 27 EU member states. The findings support the clear advantage of the quality of environmental data disclosure in the 'old' EU member states (which joined before 2004) as to compared to the 'new' EU member states.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 162
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Adams C., 2007, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V20, P333, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570710748535
[2]  
Amariei C., 2019, ECMI Policy Brief" 26
[3]   Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey [J].
Amel-Zadeh, Amir ;
Serafeim, George .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2018, 74 (03) :87-103
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Environmental, Social, and Governance
[5]   The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression [J].
Avetisyan, Emma ;
Hockerts, Kai .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (03) :316-330
[6]  
Boffo R., 2020, ESG Investing: Environmental Pillar Scoring and Reporting
[7]   Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: the importance of environmental performance and assurance [J].
Braam, Geert J. M. ;
de Weerd, Lisanne Uit ;
Hauck, Mara ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 129 :724-734
[8]   Current Trends within Social and Environmental Accounting Research: A Literature Review [J].
Chung, Jieun ;
Cho, Charles H. .
ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 17 (02) :207-239
[9]  
Commission E, 2019, EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL, DOI [DOI 10.2833/9937, 10.2833/9937]
[10]  
Communication from the Commission, 2019, Guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information C/2019/4490