Wind turbine dynamic shading: The effects on combined solar and wind farms

被引:1
作者
Dekker, Nico J. [1 ]
Slooff, Lenneke H. [1 ]
Jansen, Mark J. [1 ]
de Graaff, Gertjan [1 ]
Hovius, Jaco [2 ]
Jonkman, Rudi [3 ]
Zuurbier, Jesper [4 ]
Pronk, Jan [5 ]
机构
[1] TNO Solar Energy, Westerduinweg 3, NL-1755 LE Petten, Netherlands
[2] Vattenfall, Hoekenrode 8, NL-1102 BR Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Heliox, De Waal 24, NL-5684 PH Best, Netherlands
[4] Uw Stroom, Warmenhuizen, Netherlands
[5] Prosoldiga, Schagen, Netherlands
关键词
SYSTEM; CONGESTION;
D O I
10.1063/5.0176121
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Dutch climate agreement anticipates the large-scale implementation of solar and wind energy systems on land and water. Combining solar and wind farms has the benefit of multiple surface area use, and it also has the advantage of energy generation from both solar and wind energy systems, which is rather complementary in time; thus, a better balance can be found between electricity generation and demand and the load on the electricity grid. In combined solar and wind farms (CSWFs), the turbines will cast shadows on the solar panels. This concerns the static shadow from the construction tower of the turbine as well as the dynamic shadow caused by the rotating blades. This paper reports on the results of millisecond data monitoring of the PV farm of a CSWF in the Netherlands on land. Static and dynamic shadow effects are discussed, as well as their dependency on farm design. It is observed that the dynamic shade of the wind turbine blade causes serious disturbances of the DC inputs of the inverter, resulting in deviation of the maximum power point tracking monitored. The shadow of the wind turbine results in a total energy loss of about 6% for the given period, park configuration, PV modules, inverter type, and setting.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Agrawal M., 2017, INT C SMART TECHNOLO
  • [2] Closed form solution of Eigen frequency of monopile supported offshore wind turbines in deeper waters incorporating stiffness of substructure and SSI
    Arany, Laszlo
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Macdonald, John H. G.
    Hogan, S. John
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 83 : 18 - 32
  • [3] Bakken B. E., 2022, 6th Edition of Energy Transition Outlook
  • [4] Enhanced Maximum Power Point Techniques for Solar Photovoltaic System under Uniform Insolation and Partial Shading Conditions: A Review
    Bhukya, Laxman
    Kedika, Narender Reddy
    Salkuti, Surender Reddy
    [J]. ALGORITHMS, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [5] Bloomberg NEF, 2022, New Energy Outlook
  • [6] Wind Farm Noise-Modulation of the Amplitude
    Cooper, Steven
    [J]. ACOUSTICS, 2021, 3 (02): : 364 - 390
  • [7] An intelligent maximum power point tracker using peak current control
    D'Souza, NS
    Lopes, LAC
    Liu, XJ
    [J]. 2005 IEEE 36TH POWER ELECTRONIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PESC), VOLS 1-3, 2005, : 172 - 177
  • [8] Voltage Track Optimizer Based Maximum Power Point Tracker Under Challenging Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Systems
    Deboucha, Houssam
    Kermadi, Mostefa
    Mekhilef, Saad
    Lalouni, Sofia
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2021, 36 (12) : 13817 - 13825
  • [9] Deng J., 2022, Electron. Express, V19, P20220165, DOI [10.1587/elex.19.20220165, DOI 10.1587/ELEX.19.20220165]
  • [10] Foglia G. M., 2019, IEEE MILAN POWERTECH