Reliability and stability of oddball P300 amplitude in older adults: The role of stimulus sequence effects

被引:1
作者
Kamp, Siri -Maria [1 ,3 ]
Forester, Glen [2 ]
Knopf, Luisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trier, Trier, Germany
[2] Sanford Res, Ctr Biobehav Res, Fargo, ND USA
[3] Univ Trier, Dept Neurocognit Psychol, Johanniterufer 15, D-54290 Trier, Germany
关键词
P300; amplitude; Sequence effects; Reliability; Stability; Older adults; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; LATENCY; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2023.105998
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The P300 may be an individual difference marker of neuro-cognitive function, which due to age-related cognitive decline may be particularly useful in older adults. Recently, we reported effects of the local stimulus sequence in an oddball task (i.e., the number of non-targets that preceded a target) on P300 amplitude in young and older adults. The same older adults completed a second session of the task 4-8 months after the first session. Here, we examined the effect of the stimulus sequence on the between-and within-session reliability and stability of P300 amplitude and RT, and their intertrial variability, in this sample of older adults. The sequence effects - an inverted U-shape effect of the number of standards preceding a target on parietal P300, and a linear effect on frontal P300 -were stable within and across sessions on the group level. Within individuals, P300 amplitude at frontal and parietal electrodes was generally very reliable and stable, mostly independently of sequence effects, encouraging its use as an individual difference marker of neuro-cognitive function in older adults. However, measures of the strength of the sequence effects themselves showed unacceptable reliability, speaking against their use as individual difference markers, at least in older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Components in the P300:Don't forget the Novelty P3!
    Barry, Robert J.
    Steiner, Genevieve Z.
    De Blasio, Frances M.
    Fogarty, Jack S.
    Karamacoska, Diana
    MacDonald, Brett
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 (07)
  • [2] Long-term test-retest reliability of the P3 No Go wave and two independent components decomposed from the P3 No Go wave in a visual Go/NoGo task
    Brunner, Jan Ferenc
    Hansen, Tor Ivar
    Olsen, Alexander
    Skandsen, Toni
    Haberg, Asta
    Kropotov, Juri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 89 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [3] P300 amplitude and latency in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis
    Cui, Tingkai
    Wang, Peizhong Peter
    Liu, Shengxin
    Zhang, Xin
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 26 (02) : 177 - 190
  • [5] The P300 event-related brain potential as a neurobiological endophenotype for substance use disorders: A meta-analytic investigation
    Euser, Anja S.
    Arends, Lidia R.
    Evans, Brittany E.
    Greaves-Lord, Kirstin
    Huizink, Anja C.
    Franken, Ingmar H. A.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (01) : 572 - 603
  • [6] Fabiani M., 1987, Advances in psychophysiology, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6
  • [7] FOLSTEIN MF, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P812
  • [8] A differential role for human hippocampus in novelty and contextual processing: Implications for P300
    Fonken, Yvonne M.
    Kam, Julia W. Y.
    Knight, Robert T.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 (07)
  • [9] Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task
    Gonsalvez, Craig J.
    Barry, Robert J.
    Rushby, Jacqueline A.
    Polich, John
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (02) : 245 - 250
  • [10] Gualberto Cintra MT, 2015, J NEUROLOGY NEUROPHY, V6, P1