Ninety-degree angled collimator: a dosimetric study related to dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with endometrial carcinoma

被引:0
作者
Serarslan, Alparslan [1 ]
Dastan, Yalcin [1 ]
Aksu, Telat [1 ]
Yildiz, Rana Elif [1 ]
Gursel, Bilge [1 ]
Meydan, Deniz [1 ]
Okumus, Nilguen Ozbek [1 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiye
关键词
Dosimetry; Endometrial carcinoma; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; ARC THERAPY; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CERVICAL-CANCER; PHASE-II; GUIDELINES; ONCOLOGY; REIRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-11033-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundOur purpose was to ensure that the dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) were not exceeded while increasing the prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) from 45 to 50.4 Gray (Gy) with the dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. While trying for this purpose, a new dynamic IMRT technique named 90 degrees angled collimated dynamic IMRT (A-IMRT) planning was developed by us.MethodsThis study was based on the computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with postoperatively diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2 endometrial carcinoma. For each patient, conventional dynamic IMRT (C-IMRT, collimator angle of 0 degrees at all gantry angles), A-IMRT (collimator angle of 90 degrees at gantry angles of 110 degrees, 180 degrees, 215 degrees, and 285 degrees), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned. Planning techniques were compared with parameters used to evaluate PTV and OARs via dose-volume-histogram analysis using the paired two-tailed Wilcoxon's signed-rank test; p ResultsAll plans achieved adequate dose coverage for PTV. Although the technique with the lowest mean conformality index was A-IMRT (0.76 +/- 0.05) compared to both C-IMRT (0.79 +/- 0.04, p = 0.000) and VMAT (0.83 +/- 0.03, p = 0.000), it protected the OARs especially the bladder (V45 = 32.84 +/- 2.03 vs. 44.21 +/- 6.67, p = 0.000), rectum (V30 = 56.18 +/- 2.05 vs. 73.80 +/- 4.75, p = 0.000) and both femoral heads (V30 for right = 12.19 +/- 1.34 vs. 21.42 +/- 4.03, p = 0.000 and V30 for left = 12.58 +/- 1.48 vs. 21.35 +/- 4.16, p = 0.000) better than C-IMRT. While the dose constraints of the bladder, rectum and bilateral femoral heads were not exceeded in any patient with A-IMRT or VMAT, they were exceeded in 19 (95%), 20 (100%) and 20 (100%) patients with C-IMRT, respectively.ConclusionsOARs are better protected when external beam radiotherapy is applied to the pelvis at a dose of 50.4 Gy by turning the collimator angle to 90 degrees at some gantry angles with the dynamic IMRT technique in the absence of VMAT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ning, Zhong-Hua
    Mu, Jin-Ming
    Jin, Jian-Xue
    Li, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Qi-Lin
    Gu, Wen-Dong
    Huang, Jin
    Han, Yang
    Pei, Hong-Lei
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [32] Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy
    Mell, Loren K.
    Kochanski, Joel D.
    Roeske, John C.
    Haslam, Josh J.
    Mehta, Neil
    Yamada, S. Diane
    Hurteau, Jean A.
    Collins, Yvonne C.
    Lengyel, Ernst
    Mundt, Arno J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (05): : 1356 - 1365
  • [33] Dosimetric comparison of postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for endometrial cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and helical tomotherapy
    Yang, Ruijie
    Xu, Shouping
    Jiang, Weijuan
    Wang, Junjie
    Xie, Chuanbin
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2010, 49 (02) : 230 - 236
  • [34] Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, static intensity-modulated and helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in glioblastoma. Dosimetric comparison in patients with overlap between target volumes and organs at risk
    Buglione, Michela
    Spiazzi, Luigi
    Saiani, Federica
    Costa, Loredana
    Shehi, Blerina
    Lazzari, Barbara
    Uccelli, Chiara
    Pasinetti, Nadia
    Borghetti, Paolo
    Triggiani, Luca
    Donadoni, Laura
    Pedretti, Sara
    Magrini, Stefano M.
    TUMORI, 2014, 100 (03) : 272 - 277
  • [35] A Dosimetric Study of Volumetric Arc Modulation with RapidArc Versus Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer Patients
    Goswami, Brijesh
    Jain, Rakesh Kumar
    Yadav, Suresh
    Kumar, Sunil
    Oommen, Saji
    Manocha, Sapna
    Jadhav, Ganesh K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (05)
  • [36] Risk of swallowing-related chest infections in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Xiong, Jiaqing
    Krishnaswamy, Gita
    Raynor, Sharon
    Loh, Kwok Seng
    Kwa, Andrea Lay Hoon
    Lim, Chwee Ming
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 : E1660 - E1665
  • [37] Assessment of anatomical and dosimetric changes by a deformable registration method during the course of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lu, Jie
    Ma, Yidong
    Chen, Jinhu
    Wang, Liming
    Zhang, Guifang
    Zhao, Mukun
    Yin, Yong
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [38] Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lee, Tsair-Fwu
    Fang, Fu-Min
    Chao, Pei-Ju
    Su, T. -J.
    Wang, Luke K.
    Leung, Stephen W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [39] Clinical and dosimetric study of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Thibouw, David
    Truc, Gilles
    Bertaut, Aurelie
    Chevalier, Cedric
    Aubignac, Leone
    Mirjolet, Celine
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 137 (02) : 429 - 438
  • [40] Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
    Wu, Shixiu
    Xia, Bing
    Han, Fei
    Xie, Ruifei
    Song, Tao
    Lu, Lixia
    Yu, Wei
    Deng, Xiaowu
    He, Qiancheng
    Zhao, Cong
    Xie, Conghua
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):