Ninety-degree angled collimator: a dosimetric study related to dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with endometrial carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Serarslan, Alparslan [1 ]
Dastan, Yalcin [1 ]
Aksu, Telat [1 ]
Yildiz, Rana Elif [1 ]
Gursel, Bilge [1 ]
Meydan, Deniz [1 ]
Okumus, Nilguen Ozbek [1 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiye
关键词
Dosimetry; Endometrial carcinoma; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; ARC THERAPY; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CERVICAL-CANCER; PHASE-II; GUIDELINES; ONCOLOGY; REIRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-11033-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundOur purpose was to ensure that the dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) were not exceeded while increasing the prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) from 45 to 50.4 Gray (Gy) with the dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. While trying for this purpose, a new dynamic IMRT technique named 90 degrees angled collimated dynamic IMRT (A-IMRT) planning was developed by us.MethodsThis study was based on the computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with postoperatively diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2 endometrial carcinoma. For each patient, conventional dynamic IMRT (C-IMRT, collimator angle of 0 degrees at all gantry angles), A-IMRT (collimator angle of 90 degrees at gantry angles of 110 degrees, 180 degrees, 215 degrees, and 285 degrees), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned. Planning techniques were compared with parameters used to evaluate PTV and OARs via dose-volume-histogram analysis using the paired two-tailed Wilcoxon's signed-rank test; p ResultsAll plans achieved adequate dose coverage for PTV. Although the technique with the lowest mean conformality index was A-IMRT (0.76 +/- 0.05) compared to both C-IMRT (0.79 +/- 0.04, p = 0.000) and VMAT (0.83 +/- 0.03, p = 0.000), it protected the OARs especially the bladder (V45 = 32.84 +/- 2.03 vs. 44.21 +/- 6.67, p = 0.000), rectum (V30 = 56.18 +/- 2.05 vs. 73.80 +/- 4.75, p = 0.000) and both femoral heads (V30 for right = 12.19 +/- 1.34 vs. 21.42 +/- 4.03, p = 0.000 and V30 for left = 12.58 +/- 1.48 vs. 21.35 +/- 4.16, p = 0.000) better than C-IMRT. While the dose constraints of the bladder, rectum and bilateral femoral heads were not exceeded in any patient with A-IMRT or VMAT, they were exceeded in 19 (95%), 20 (100%) and 20 (100%) patients with C-IMRT, respectively.ConclusionsOARs are better protected when external beam radiotherapy is applied to the pelvis at a dose of 50.4 Gy by turning the collimator angle to 90 degrees at some gantry angles with the dynamic IMRT technique in the absence of VMAT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ninety-degree angled collimator: a dosimetric study related to dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with endometrial carcinoma
    Alparslan Serarslan
    Yalçın Daştan
    Telat Aksu
    Rana Elif Yıldız
    Bilge Gürsel
    Deniz Meydan
    Nilgün Özbek Okumuş
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [2] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: dosimetric and clinical results
    Bae, Sun Hyun
    Jang, Won Il
    Park, Hee Chul
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (35) : 59965 - 59976
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Wang, Shichao
    Ai, Ping
    Xie, Li
    Xu, Qingfeng
    Bai, Sen
    Lu, You
    Li, Ping
    Chen, Nianyong
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (04) : 454 - 459
  • [4] Volumetric and Dosimetric Changes in Bladder and Rectum and Target During Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Patients of Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix
    Nair, Sharanya R.
    Gupta, Sweety
    Krishnan, Ajay S.
    Chophy, Atokali
    Rastogi, Aviral
    Kumar, Ravi Roushan
    Namitha, R. S.
    Joseph, Deepa M.
    Gupta, Manoj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [5] A prospective study on volumetric and dosimetric changes during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
    Cheng, Harry C. Y.
    Wu, Vincent W. C.
    Ngan, Roger K. C.
    Tang, K. W.
    Chan, Charlie C. L.
    Wong, K. H.
    Au, S. K.
    Kwong, Dora L. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (03) : 317 - 323
  • [6] Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients
    Deng, Xia
    Han, Ce
    Chen, Shan
    Xie, Congying
    Yi, Jinling
    Zhou, Yongqiang
    Zheng, Xiaomin
    Deng, Zhenxiang
    Jin, Xiance
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [7] A dosimetric study on radiation-induced hypothyroidism following intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Xu, Yumei
    Shao, Zhiying
    Tang, Tianyou
    Liu, Guihong
    Yao, Yuanhu
    Wang, Jianshe
    Zhang, Longzhen
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (05) : 6126 - 6132
  • [8] Dosimetric Predictors of Dysphonia after Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
    Sanguineti, G.
    Ricchetti, F.
    McNutt, T.
    Wu, B.
    Fiorino, C.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [9] Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Ju, Sang Gyu
    Kim, Minkyu
    Kim, Jung-in
    Kim, Jin Man
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    Han, Youngyih
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Choi, Doo Ho
    Nam, Heerim
    Park, Hee Chul
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02)
  • [10] Outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Yeh, Shyh-An
    Hwang, Tzer-Zen
    Wang, Chih-Chun
    Yang, Chuen-Chien
    Lien, Ching-Feng
    Wang, Chien-Chung
    Hsu, Tun-Yen
    Hsu, Ruey-Feng
    Shih, Yu-Chen
    Huang, Yaw-Chang
    Hsieh, Meng-Che
    Gau, Jhy-Shyan
    Chang, Liyun
    Lee, Tsair-Fwu
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (03) : 438 - 447