Big Five personality traits predict small but robust differences in civic engagement

被引:10
作者
Stahlmann, Alexander G. [1 ]
Hopwood, Christopher J. [1 ]
Bleidorn, Wiebke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol, Binzmuhlestr 14,Box 7, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
aspects; charitable giving; donating blood; political voting; posthumous organ donation; vaccination; volunteerism; POLITICAL INTEREST; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; VALIDITY; DOMAINS; FACETS; PROSOCIALITY; VACCINATION; STABILITY; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1111/jopy.12838
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: This preregistered study provides robust estimates of the links between Big Five personality traits and civic engagement across different samples and life stages. Methods: We recruited two samples from the United States and United Kingdom (total N = 1593) and measured Big Five domains, Big Five aspects, and six civic engagement indicators: volunteerism, charitable giving, donating blood, posthumous organ donation, political voting, and vaccination. We compared the links between these measures across samples and tested moderation across life stages and several sociodemographic variables. We explored whether these links replicate between self-and peer-reports. Results: We found small but robust effects. Agreeable, extraverted, and open/intellectual participants reported more civic engagement, especially volunteerism and charitable giving. Neurotic and conscientious participants mainly reported less civic engagement, especially blood and organ donations. One of the two Big Five aspects often drove these links, such as Compassion in the link between Agreeableness and volunteerism. We found some differences between younger and middle-aged adults. Conclusions: Big Five personality traits predict civic engagement modestly but consistently, with adequate study power being critical to detecting these links. Lower-order traits, such as Big Five aspects, clarify the relationships between traits and engagement. Life stages and sociodemographic variables have limited effects.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 494
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [2] What Do We Mean By "Civic Engagement"?
    Adler, Richard P.
    Goggin, Judy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2005, 3 (03) : 236 - 253
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264189515-EN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Applied Developmental Science, DOI [10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_7, DOI 10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_7, DOI 10.1207/S1532480XADS06047]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, How's life? Measuring wellbeing, DOI DOI 10.1787/HOW_LIFE-2015-EN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2021, Private Philanthropy for Development - Second Edition: Data for Action. The Development Dimension, DOI DOI 10.1787/CDF37F1E-EN
  • [7] A Mega-Analysis of Personality Prediction: Robustness and Boundary Conditions
    Beck, Emorie D.
    Jackson, Joshua J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 122 (03) : 523 - 553
  • [8] Traditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality
    Bekkers, Rene
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2006, 69 (04) : 349 - 366
  • [9] Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money
    Bekkers, Rene
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 39 (03) : 369 - 381
  • [10] The Policy Relevance of Personality Traits
    Bleidorn, Wiebke
    Hill, Patrick L.
    Back, Mitja D.
    Denissen, Jaap J. A.
    Hennecke, Marie
    Hopwood, Christopher J.
    Jokela, Markus
    Kandler, Christian
    Lucas, Richard E.
    Luhmann, Maike
    Orth, Ulrich
    Wagner, Jenny
    Wrzus, Cornelia
    Zimmermann, Johannes
    Roberts, Brent
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2019, 74 (09) : 1056 - 1067